Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry · 2024
Improved naming in patients with Broca's aphasia with tDCS.
Рандомизированное исследованиеКлиническое исследование II фазыСтатьяПоддержка правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Bonilha Leonardo, Rorden Chris, Roth Rebecca, Sen Souvik, George Mark S, Fridriksson Julius
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Language impairment (aphasia) is a common neurological deficit after strokes. For individuals with chronic aphasia (beyond 6 months after the stroke), language improvements with speech therapy (ST) are often limited. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a promising approach to complement language recovery but interindividual variability in treatment response is common after tDCS, suggesting a possible relationship between tDCS and type of linguistic impairment (aphasia type).
METHODS: This current study is a subgroup analysis of a randomised controlled phase II futility design clinical trial on tDCS in chronic post-stroke aphasia. All participants received ST coupled with tDCS (n=31) vs sham tDCS (n=39). Confrontation naming was tested at baseline, and 1, 4, and 24 weeks post-treatment.
RESULTS: Broca's aphasia was associated with maximal adjunctive benefit of tDCS, with an average improvement of 10 additional named items with tDCS+ST compared with ST alone at 4 weeks post-treatment. In comparison, tDCS was not associated with significant benefits for other aphasia types F(1)=4.23, p=0.04. Among participants with Broca's aphasia, preservation of the perilesional posterior inferior temporal cortex was associated with higher treatment benefit (R=0.35, p=0.03).
CONCLUSIONS: These results indicate that adjuvant tDCS can enhance ST to treat naming in Broca's aphasia, and this may guide intervention approaches in future studies.
METHODS: This current study is a subgroup analysis of a randomised controlled phase II futility design clinical trial on tDCS in chronic post-stroke aphasia. All participants received ST coupled with tDCS (n=31) vs sham tDCS (n=39). Confrontation naming was tested at baseline, and 1, 4, and 24 weeks post-treatment.
RESULTS: Broca's aphasia was associated with maximal adjunctive benefit of tDCS, with an average improvement of 10 additional named items with tDCS+ST compared with ST alone at 4 weeks post-treatment. In comparison, tDCS was not associated with significant benefits for other aphasia types F(1)=4.23, p=0.04. Among participants with Broca's aphasia, preservation of the perilesional posterior inferior temporal cortex was associated with higher treatment benefit (R=0.35, p=0.03).
CONCLUSIONS: These results indicate that adjuvant tDCS can enhance ST to treat naming in Broca's aphasia, and this may guide intervention approaches in future studies.