The Permanente journal · 2023
Virtual Visits for Developmental Screening in High-Risk Infants.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Jayaraman Madhangi, Gupta Mandhir, Varghese Ninu, Yan Rui, Xu Julie X, Mallin Jeffrey Scott
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: The High-Risk Infant Follow-Up program screens neonatal intensive care unit graduates for developmental delays and refers patients to physical, occupational, or speech therapy. At Kaiser Permanente Downey, the High-Risk Infant Follow-Up program assessed development via video visits during the COVID-19 pandemic. This study compares rates of enrollment in and referral to therapies and California Regional Center services between infants assessed by video visits and those assessed in person.
METHODS: Study participants included infants in the High-Risk Infant Follow-Up program between March 2020 and March 2021 with developmental assessments at adjusted ages 6, 12, and 18 months. Rates of enrollment in services and referral to physical, occupational, and speech therapy and Regional Center services were compared between infants assessed virtually and in person.
RESULTS: There were no significant differences in rates of enrollment or referral to physical, occupational, or speech therapy services or Regional Center services. The rate of referral at any of the 3 visits was 8.6% at in-person visits and 10.9% at virtual visits (p = 0.49). Infants whose first visit was virtual were just as likely to complete all 3 developmental assessments as those whose first visit was in person.
DISCUSSION: The COVID-19 pandemic stay-at-home orders provided a "natural experiment" demonstrating the effectiveness of virtual visits as compared to in-person visits. Although the developmental assessment tool used was not standardized to be used virtually, virtual visits were just as likely to result in referrals to services and did not lead to loss of follow-up.
CONCLUSION: Virtual visits may be useful and convenient for some families, but further study is required.
METHODS: Study participants included infants in the High-Risk Infant Follow-Up program between March 2020 and March 2021 with developmental assessments at adjusted ages 6, 12, and 18 months. Rates of enrollment in services and referral to physical, occupational, and speech therapy and Regional Center services were compared between infants assessed virtually and in person.
RESULTS: There were no significant differences in rates of enrollment or referral to physical, occupational, or speech therapy services or Regional Center services. The rate of referral at any of the 3 visits was 8.6% at in-person visits and 10.9% at virtual visits (p = 0.49). Infants whose first visit was virtual were just as likely to complete all 3 developmental assessments as those whose first visit was in person.
DISCUSSION: The COVID-19 pandemic stay-at-home orders provided a "natural experiment" demonstrating the effectiveness of virtual visits as compared to in-person visits. Although the developmental assessment tool used was not standardized to be used virtually, virtual visits were just as likely to result in referrals to services and did not lead to loss of follow-up.
CONCLUSION: Virtual visits may be useful and convenient for some families, but further study is required.