Journal of voice : official journal of the Voice Foundation · 2021
Characterization of Dermatoglyphic Profiles and its Relation to Acoustic Measures in Voice Professionals.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Santana Émile Rocha, Oliveira Priscila, Magacho-Coelho Cristiane, Lopes Leonardo, Sacramento Lisiane Silva Carvalho
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: Acoustic analysis is widely used for assessing and monitoring vocal function. Dermatoglyphics is a method that analyzes genetic fingerprint markers, and uses that information for predicting physical skills related to anaerobic (explosive strength and speed) and aerobic (motor coordination and resistance) mechanisms. Therefore, it can be used as an indicator for individualized vocal training.
OBJECTIVE: To characterize the dermatoglyphic profiles and their relation to acoustic measures in voice professionals.
METHODS: A cross-sectional study involving 79 voice professionals. Acoustic analysis was performed using the PRAAT software. Mean intensity, fundamental frequency (F0), and cepstral peak prominence (CPP) value were extracted from the sustained vowel /a/. Fingerprints were collected using a Watson mini-integrated biometric scanner, and were quantified by design predominance, delta index (D10), total ridge count (TRC), and dermatoglyphic profile. The acoustic measures were analyzed descriptively and compared, considering the subjects' dermatoglyphic profiles. The confidence levels ranged from 90% to 95%.
RESULTS: Most subjects exhibited anaerobic dermatoglyphic profiles (P = 0.004) and low TRC (p < 0.001). Higher F0 (P = 0.061), intensity (P = 0.065), and CPP (P = 0.073) were found for anaerobics (P < 0.001). There was a weak and negative correlation between TRC and intensity (P = 0.026), as well as between F0 (P = 0.017) and CPP (P = 0.069).
CONCLUSION: Anaerobic profiles were predominant. The values of F0, intensity, and CPP increased for the anaerobics. There was a weak negative correlation between the TRC and intensity, F0, and CPP measures. Dermatoglyphics could have been seen as an interesting tool in the voice assessment and training direction for voice professionals.
OBJECTIVE: To characterize the dermatoglyphic profiles and their relation to acoustic measures in voice professionals.
METHODS: A cross-sectional study involving 79 voice professionals. Acoustic analysis was performed using the PRAAT software. Mean intensity, fundamental frequency (F0), and cepstral peak prominence (CPP) value were extracted from the sustained vowel /a/. Fingerprints were collected using a Watson mini-integrated biometric scanner, and were quantified by design predominance, delta index (D10), total ridge count (TRC), and dermatoglyphic profile. The acoustic measures were analyzed descriptively and compared, considering the subjects' dermatoglyphic profiles. The confidence levels ranged from 90% to 95%.
RESULTS: Most subjects exhibited anaerobic dermatoglyphic profiles (P = 0.004) and low TRC (p < 0.001). Higher F0 (P = 0.061), intensity (P = 0.065), and CPP (P = 0.073) were found for anaerobics (P < 0.001). There was a weak and negative correlation between TRC and intensity (P = 0.026), as well as between F0 (P = 0.017) and CPP (P = 0.069).
CONCLUSION: Anaerobic profiles were predominant. The values of F0, intensity, and CPP increased for the anaerobics. There was a weak negative correlation between the TRC and intensity, F0, and CPP measures. Dermatoglyphics could have been seen as an interesting tool in the voice assessment and training direction for voice professionals.