Movement disorders clinical practice · 2021
A Self-Reported Clinical Tool Predicts Falls in People with Parkinson's Disease.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Almeida Lorena Rosa S, Piemonte Maria Elisa Pimentel, Cavalcanti Helen M, Canning Colleen G, Paul Serene S
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: A 3-step clinical prediction tool including falling in the previous year, freezing of gait in the past month and self-selected gait speed <1.1 m/s has shown high accuracy in predicting falls in people with Parkinson's disease (PD). The accuracy of this tool when including only self-report measures is yet to be determined.
OBJECTIVES: To validate the 3-step prediction tool using only self-report measures (3-step self-reported prediction tool), and to externally validate the 3-step clinical prediction tool.
METHODS: The clinical tool was used with 137 individuals with PD. Participants also answered a question about self-reported gait speed, enabling scoring of the self-reported tool, and were followed-up for 6 months. An intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC2,1) was calculated to evaluate test-retest reliability of the 3-step self-reported prediction tool. Multivariate logistic regression models were used to evaluate the performance of both tools and their discriminative ability was determined using the area under the curve (AUC).
RESULTS: Forty-two participants (31%) reported ≥1 fall during follow-up. The 3-step self-reported tool had an ICC2,1 of 0.991 (95% CI 0.971-0.997; P < 0.001) and AUC = 0.68; 95% CI 0.59-0.77, while the 3-step clinical tool had an AUC = 0.69; 95% CI 0.60-0.78.
CONCLUSIONS: The 3-step self-reported prediction tool showed excellent test-retest reliability and was validated with acceptable accuracy in predicting falls in the next 6 months. The 3-step clinical prediction tool was externally validated with similar accuracy. The 3-step self-reported prediction tool may be useful to identify people with PD at risk of falls in e/tele-health settings.
OBJECTIVES: To validate the 3-step prediction tool using only self-report measures (3-step self-reported prediction tool), and to externally validate the 3-step clinical prediction tool.
METHODS: The clinical tool was used with 137 individuals with PD. Participants also answered a question about self-reported gait speed, enabling scoring of the self-reported tool, and were followed-up for 6 months. An intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC2,1) was calculated to evaluate test-retest reliability of the 3-step self-reported prediction tool. Multivariate logistic regression models were used to evaluate the performance of both tools and their discriminative ability was determined using the area under the curve (AUC).
RESULTS: Forty-two participants (31%) reported ≥1 fall during follow-up. The 3-step self-reported tool had an ICC2,1 of 0.991 (95% CI 0.971-0.997; P < 0.001) and AUC = 0.68; 95% CI 0.59-0.77, while the 3-step clinical tool had an AUC = 0.69; 95% CI 0.60-0.78.
CONCLUSIONS: The 3-step self-reported prediction tool showed excellent test-retest reliability and was validated with acceptable accuracy in predicting falls in the next 6 months. The 3-step clinical prediction tool was externally validated with similar accuracy. The 3-step self-reported prediction tool may be useful to identify people with PD at risk of falls in e/tele-health settings.