Journal of voice : official journal of the Voice Foundation · 2020
Glottal Function Index: Validity and Reliability of the Persian Language Version in Patients With Voice Disorders.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Torabi Hadi, Ansari Noureddin Nakhostin, Zamani Farzad, Dalvand Hamid
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To translate and cross-culturally adapt the Glottal Function Index into the Persian language (GFIp) and validate it in patients with voice disorders.
STUDY DESIGN: A cross-sectional and prospective validation design was adopted.
METHOD: The GFI was translated and culturally adapted into Persian language according to the methodology of standard forward-backward translations to obtain semantic, idiomatic, and conceptual equivalence. One hundred patients with voice disorders (53 men; mean age: 41.4 ± 13.6 years) and 40 healthy volunteers (21 women; mean age: 36.7 ± 10.0 years) completed the GFIp. Patients with voice disorders also completed the Persian Voice Handicap Index (VHIp) to assess the construct validity.
RESULTS: There were no floor and ceiling effects. Evidence for construct validity was found with a significant very good correlation between the GFIp and the VHIp total scores (r = 0.70; P < 0.001). Differences of GFIp scores between the patients and healthy participants were statistically significant (P < 0.001) confirming discriminant validity. The internal consistency reliability was acceptable for GFIp (Cronbach's α = 0.74). Absolute reliability measures of Standard Error of Measurement and the Smallest Detectable Change for GFIp were 2.5 (confidence interval 95% = ±4.9) and 6.93, respectively. Factor analysis revealed the GFIp as a single factor instrument.
CONCLUSION: The GFIp is a valid and reliable self-administered instrument for use in Persian-speaking patients with voice disorders.
STUDY DESIGN: A cross-sectional and prospective validation design was adopted.
METHOD: The GFI was translated and culturally adapted into Persian language according to the methodology of standard forward-backward translations to obtain semantic, idiomatic, and conceptual equivalence. One hundred patients with voice disorders (53 men; mean age: 41.4 ± 13.6 years) and 40 healthy volunteers (21 women; mean age: 36.7 ± 10.0 years) completed the GFIp. Patients with voice disorders also completed the Persian Voice Handicap Index (VHIp) to assess the construct validity.
RESULTS: There were no floor and ceiling effects. Evidence for construct validity was found with a significant very good correlation between the GFIp and the VHIp total scores (r = 0.70; P < 0.001). Differences of GFIp scores between the patients and healthy participants were statistically significant (P < 0.001) confirming discriminant validity. The internal consistency reliability was acceptable for GFIp (Cronbach's α = 0.74). Absolute reliability measures of Standard Error of Measurement and the Smallest Detectable Change for GFIp were 2.5 (confidence interval 95% = ±4.9) and 6.93, respectively. Factor analysis revealed the GFIp as a single factor instrument.
CONCLUSION: The GFIp is a valid and reliable self-administered instrument for use in Persian-speaking patients with voice disorders.