MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1002/hed.25540

Медицинская библиотека · Head & neck · 2018

Multicenter prospective study on the use and outcome of rehabilitation after total laryngectomy in Germany.

Singer Susanne, Vogel Hans-Joachim, Guntinas-Lichius Orlando, Erdmann-Reusch Bianca, Fuchs Michael, Taylor Katherine, Meyer Alexandra, Keszte Judith

СтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to assess the use and outcome of rehabilitation after total laryngectomy in Germany.

METHODS

We enrolled patients who were scheduled for total laryngectomy, approached them again after surgery, after 3 months and 1 year. Patients completed questionnaires and were interviewed.

RESULTS

Of 309 participants, 14% had not received any rehabilitation. Reasons for nonuse were primarily ongoing treatment and poor health. Users of rehabilitation had 4 times the odds of attaining any ability to speak compared to nonusers (odds ratio 3.8, P = .02). The main aim of rehabilitation from the perspective of the users was speech rehabilitation, mentioned by 71% before starting rehabilitation. This was also what most users (27%) found the most helpful part of rehabilitation.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients are interested in attending rehabilitation. They especially want to improve their speech capacity, which indeed is better among users of rehabilitation than in those without.

Для цитирования: Singer Susanne, Vogel Hans-Joachim, Guntinas-Lichius Orlando, Erdmann-Reusch Bianca, Fuchs Michael, Taylor Katherine, Meyer Alexandra, Keszte Judith. Multicenter prospective study on the use and outcome of rehabilitation after total laryngectomy in Germany.. Head & neck. 2018. DOI: 10.1002/hed.25540.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.