MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1111/dmcn.13342

Медицинская библиотека · Developmental medicine and child neurology · 2016

Speech and language interventions for infants aged 0 to 2 years at high risk for cerebral palsy: a systematic review.

Chorna Olena, Hamm Ellyn, Cummings Caitlin, Fetters Ashley, Maitre Nathalie L

СтатьяСистематический обзорПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

AIM: We evaluated the level of evidence of speech, language, and communication interventions for infants at high-risk for, or with a diagnosis of, cerebral palsy (CP) from 0 to 2 years old.

METHOD: We performed a systematic review of relevant terms. Articles were evaluated based on the level of methodological quality and evidence according to A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR) and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) guidelines.

RESULTS

The search terms provided 17 publications consisting of speech or language interventions. There were no interventions in the high level of evidence category. The overall level of evidence was very low. Promising interventions included Responsivity and Prelinguistic Milieu Teaching and other parent-infant transaction frameworks.

INTERPRETATION: There are few evidence-based interventions addressing speech, language, and communication needs of infants and toddlers at high risk for CP, and none for infants diagnosed with CP. Recommendation guidelines include parent-infant transaction programs.

Для цитирования: Chorna Olena, Hamm Ellyn, Cummings Caitlin, Fetters Ashley, Maitre Nathalie L. Speech and language interventions for infants aged 0 to 2 years at high risk for cerebral palsy: a systematic review.. Developmental medicine and child neurology. 2016. DOI: 10.1111/dmcn.13342.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.