Brain injury · 2013
Speech pathologists' current practice with cognitive-communication assessment during post-traumatic amnesia: a survey.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Steel Joanne, Ferguson Alison, Spencer Elizabeth, Togher Leanne
Аннотация
PRIMARY OBJECTIVE: To investigate speech pathologists' current practice with adults who are in post-traumatic amnesia (PTA).
METHOD: Speech pathologists with experience of adults in PTA were invited to take part in an online survey through Australian professional email/internet-based interest groups.
RESULTS: Forty-five speech pathologists responded to the online survey. The majority of respondents (78%) reported using informal, observational assessment methods commencing at initial contact with people in PTA or when patients' level of alertness allowed and initiating formal assessment on emergence from PTA. Seven respondents (19%) reported undertaking no assessment during PTA. Clinicians described using a range of techniques to monitor cognitive-communication during PTA, including static, dynamic, functional and impairment-based methods.
CONCLUSIONS: The study confirmed that speech pathologists have a key role in the multidisciplinary team caring for the person in PTA, especially with family education and facilitating interactions with the rehabilitation team and family. Decision-making around timing and means of assessment of cognitive-communication during PTA appeared primarily reliant on speech pathologists' professional experience and the culture of their workplace. The findings support the need for further research into the nature of cognitive-communication disorder and resolution over this period.
METHOD: Speech pathologists with experience of adults in PTA were invited to take part in an online survey through Australian professional email/internet-based interest groups.
RESULTS: Forty-five speech pathologists responded to the online survey. The majority of respondents (78%) reported using informal, observational assessment methods commencing at initial contact with people in PTA or when patients' level of alertness allowed and initiating formal assessment on emergence from PTA. Seven respondents (19%) reported undertaking no assessment during PTA. Clinicians described using a range of techniques to monitor cognitive-communication during PTA, including static, dynamic, functional and impairment-based methods.
CONCLUSIONS: The study confirmed that speech pathologists have a key role in the multidisciplinary team caring for the person in PTA, especially with family education and facilitating interactions with the rehabilitation team and family. Decision-making around timing and means of assessment of cognitive-communication during PTA appeared primarily reliant on speech pathologists' professional experience and the culture of their workplace. The findings support the need for further research into the nature of cognitive-communication disorder and resolution over this period.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Amnesia, RetrogradeAttitude of Health PersonnelAustraliaBrain InjuriesCommunicationCommunication DisordersDecision MakingDeglutition DisordersDisease ProgressionDysarthriaFemaleGuideline AdherenceHealth Care SurveysHumansMalePatient Care TeamProfessional RoleRecovery of FunctionSpeech TherapySpeech-Language Pathology