The British journal of dermatology · 2008
Randomized, double-blind clinical trial to evaluate the efficacy of topical tacalcitol and sunlight exposure in the treatment of adult nonsegmental vitiligo.
СтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Rodríguez-Martín M, García Bustínduy M, Sáez Rodríguez M, Noda Cabrera A
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Vitiligo is a common skin disease which is difficult to treat. Approximately half of patients acquire the disease before the age of 20 years. This disease has a high stigmatizing impact but no ideal, aetiology-oriented, effective therapy has been found to date. Tacalcitol and other vitamin D analogues have been shown to have stimulating activity both on immunomodulatory mediators and on melanocytes in lesional skin.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the efficacy and safety of tacalcitol ointment plus sunlight exposure in the treatment of nonsegmental vitiligo.
METHODS: A single-centre, randomized, double-blind, vehicle-controlled study including 80 patients with nonsegmental vitiligo was carried out in a specialized outpatient dermatology clinic within a tertiary care, university-affiliated hospital in Spain. Efficacy was assessed by quantification of the lesional repigmentation area at the end of the study compared with the baseline. Tacalcitol (n = 40) or matching placebo ointment (n = 40) was applied once a day at night. Daily exposure to sunlight for 30 min was performed. Treatment was continued for 4 months. The response of the lesions was clinically verified every 2 weeks by a blinded medical investigator. All adverse effects were recorded.
RESULTS: Eighty adult patients with nonsegmental vitiligo were recruited. Over 16 weeks, 64 patients completed the study requirements. There was no significant difference in the repigmentation response at the 16-week time point between the vehicle + sunlight exposure and the tacalcitol + sunlight exposure groups. No reduction in the size of the lesions > 25% was observed in the tacalcitol-treated patients. No serious adverse effects were observed.
CONCLUSION: The combination of tacalcitol with heliotherapy has no additional advantages compared with heliotherapy alone.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the efficacy and safety of tacalcitol ointment plus sunlight exposure in the treatment of nonsegmental vitiligo.
METHODS: A single-centre, randomized, double-blind, vehicle-controlled study including 80 patients with nonsegmental vitiligo was carried out in a specialized outpatient dermatology clinic within a tertiary care, university-affiliated hospital in Spain. Efficacy was assessed by quantification of the lesional repigmentation area at the end of the study compared with the baseline. Tacalcitol (n = 40) or matching placebo ointment (n = 40) was applied once a day at night. Daily exposure to sunlight for 30 min was performed. Treatment was continued for 4 months. The response of the lesions was clinically verified every 2 weeks by a blinded medical investigator. All adverse effects were recorded.
RESULTS: Eighty adult patients with nonsegmental vitiligo were recruited. Over 16 weeks, 64 patients completed the study requirements. There was no significant difference in the repigmentation response at the 16-week time point between the vehicle + sunlight exposure and the tacalcitol + sunlight exposure groups. No reduction in the size of the lesions > 25% was observed in the tacalcitol-treated patients. No serious adverse effects were observed.
CONCLUSION: The combination of tacalcitol with heliotherapy has no additional advantages compared with heliotherapy alone.