MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1159/000206855

Медицинская библиотека · European neurology · 2009

Clinical identification of dysarthria types among neurologists, residents in neurology and speech therapists.

Van der Graaff M, Kuiper T, Zwinderman A, Van de Warrenburg B, Poels P, Offeringa A, Van der Kooi A, Speelman H, De Visser M

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Classification of dysarthria types comprises flaccid, spastic, ataxic, hypo- and hyperkinetic and mixed dysarthria. This study focussed on the ability of neurologists to clinically identify the correct type of dysarthria in neurological patients.

METHODS

Eighteen patients with dysarthria and 4 healthy controls were enrolled in the study. The gold standard for dysarthria type was the underlying neurological disease. Recordings of a standard reading passage and free speech were made. Raters were neurologists, residents in neurology and speech therapists, whose scores were compared.

RESULTS

Neurologists correctly identified 40% of the recordings, residents 41%, and speech therapists 37%. Interrater agreement was fair among all 3 groups; intrarater agreement was fair to moderate.

CONCLUSION

This study suggests that neurologists should be aware of the unreliability of identifying the dysarthria type without the use of additional validated instruments or rating scales in a clinical setting.

Для цитирования: Van der Graaff M, Kuiper T, Zwinderman A, Van de Warrenburg B, Poels P, Offeringa A, Van der Kooi A, Speelman H, De Visser M. Clinical identification of dysarthria types among neurologists, residents in neurology and speech therapists.. European neurology. 2009. DOI: 10.1159/000206855.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.