The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal : official publication of the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association · 2008
Early intervention for speech impairment in children with cleft palate.
Клиническое исследованиеСтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Scherer Nancy J, D'Antonio Linda L, McGahey Holly
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: This study explored the effectiveness of a parent-implemented, focused stimulation program on the speech characteristics of children younger than 3 years with cleft lip and palate. The research questions included the following: (1) Can parents be trained to deliver an early intervention (EI) program for children with cleft palate? (2) Does a parent-implemented EI program result in positive changes in speech characteristics?
PARTICIPANTS: Ten mother-child pairs in which the child had cleft lip and palate (CLP) and 10 mother-child pairs in which the child did not have a cleft (NCLP). The children ranged in age from 14 to 36 months of age and were matched between the CLP and the NCLP groups for vocabulary size, age, and socioeconomic status.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Group differences (CLP and the NCLP) for preintervention and postintervention language and speech measures were compared.
RESULTS: The results of this study showed that the mothers could be trained to deliver the intervention reliably. Furthermore, the results indicated that the intervention resulted in increased sound inventories, increased speech accuracy, and reduced use of glottal stops for the children with clefts.
CONCLUSIONS: While the intervention resulted in speech gains for the children with clefts, speech measures did not exceed those made by the children without clefts. The results of the study have implications for service delivery models where the services of speech-language pathologists are limited.
PARTICIPANTS: Ten mother-child pairs in which the child had cleft lip and palate (CLP) and 10 mother-child pairs in which the child did not have a cleft (NCLP). The children ranged in age from 14 to 36 months of age and were matched between the CLP and the NCLP groups for vocabulary size, age, and socioeconomic status.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Group differences (CLP and the NCLP) for preintervention and postintervention language and speech measures were compared.
RESULTS: The results of this study showed that the mothers could be trained to deliver the intervention reliably. Furthermore, the results indicated that the intervention resulted in increased sound inventories, increased speech accuracy, and reduced use of glottal stops for the children with clefts.
CONCLUSIONS: While the intervention resulted in speech gains for the children with clefts, speech measures did not exceed those made by the children without clefts. The results of the study have implications for service delivery models where the services of speech-language pathologists are limited.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Articulation DisordersCase-Control StudiesChild LanguageChild RearingChild, PreschoolCleft PalateEarly Intervention, EducationalFemaleGlottisHome NursingHumansLanguage DevelopmentMaleMatched-Pair AnalysisMothersParent-Child RelationsReference ValuesSpeech DisordersSpeech TherapySpeech-Language PathologyTreatment Outcome