Occupational risks in a representative sample of Portuguese tattoo artists: comparison between self-perception and risk assessment methods.

INTRODUCTION

In recent decades there has been a growth in the demand for tattoos and in the number of tattoo artists.

OBJECTIVES

A study was designed to compare the results obtained in the application of risk assessment instruments by the Occupational Safety and Health team with those of the risk perception of the same variable in a sample of tattoo artists.

METHODS

A risk chart was prepared and the William Fine method, the integrated risk assessment approach, and the methodology for risk assessment and accidents at work were applied for general risk assessment, whereas the Ovako Working Posture Analysis System and Rapid Entire Body Assessment were applied for ergonomic risk assessment. Tattoo artists' perception was registered in an online questionnaire.

RESULTS

The most valued risk factors by tattoo artists were forced/maintained postures and repetitive movements; conversely, interaction with old machines and/or in poor condition and monotonous work. Divergences were found when comparing the results of risk assessment with those of risk perception, since the first highlights chemical and biological agents. This may be justified by the fact that tattoo artists give more relevance to issues capable of causing faster and/or more intense semiology.

CONCLUSIONS

If the Occupational Safety and Health team is attentive and prepared to deal with these differences, it will achieve better performance.