MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1093/rap/rkaf034

Медицинская библиотека · Rheumatology advances in practice · 2025

WORKWELL process evaluation: qualitative data analyses of the participant interviews at 12- and 36-month follow-ups.

Battista Simone, Parker Jennifer, Ching Angela, Culley June, Long Sarah, Heard Alison, Hammond Alison, Radford Kathryn, Holland Paula, O'Neill Terence, Walker-Bone Karen, Prior Yeliz

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to qualitatively examine the delivery of the WORKWELL trial, a job retention vocational rehabilitation (JRVR) programme designed to help individuals with inflammatory arthritis (IA) maintain employment. A qualitative process evaluation used the Normalization Process Theory (NPT) to understand participant experiences and identify factors influencing implementation and outcomes.

METHODS

Data were collected via one-to-one telephone interviews with trial participants at 12 and 36 months. An inductive reflexive thematic analysis was followed by a deductive analysis based on NPT's four constructs (coherence, cognitive participation, collective action and reflexive monitoring).

RESULTS

Sixty-two participants (mean age 51.0; 82.3% female) were interviewed, most diagnosed with RA (75.8%). Four secondary themes were generated under NPT constructs. For 'Coherence', themes included 'Exploring the Purpose and Impact of Taking Part in WORKWELL' and 'Questionnaires as Instrument for Reflection'. In 'Cognitive Participation', the theme was 'Commitment and Investment to WORKWELL'. For 'Collective Action', we identified 'Key Actions for Successful WORKWELL', and under 'Reflexive Monitoring', the theme was 'Suggestions for Improving WORKWELL'. These themes reflected participants' mixed feelings about the intervention, finding value in the intervention but highlighting the need for more tailored, timely and relevant content. Workplace support was crucial but often insufficient. Follow-up calls from researchers to ensure questionnaire completion were seen as a way to reflect and monitor their conditions. The pandemic's impact on work environments also influenced outcomes.

CONCLUSION

Findings suggest that WORKWELL provided work support for participants, though its impact could be enhanced through greater customization, early intervention and stronger workplace engagement.

TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03942783. Registered on 8 May 2019. ISRCTN Registry ISRCTN61762297. Registered on 13 May 2019. Retrospectively registered.

Для цитирования: Battista Simone, Parker Jennifer, Ching Angela, Culley June, Long Sarah, Heard Alison, Hammond Alison, Radford Kathryn, Holland Paula, O'Neill Terence, Walker-Bone Karen, Prior Yeliz. WORKWELL process evaluation: qualitative data analyses of the participant interviews at 12- and 36-month follow-ups.. Rheumatology advances in practice. 2025. DOI: 10.1093/rap/rkaf034.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.