MedElevator
Войти в исследования Schizophrenia research · 2021
A longitudinal analysis of employment in people with severe mental illnesses in India.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Khare Chitra, McGurk Susan R, Fulford Daniel, Watve Vidyadhar G, Karandikar Neeraj J, Khare Sailee, Karandikar Dipti N, Mueser Kim T
Аннотация
PURPOSE: Little is known about the longitudinal trajectories of employment in people with severe mental illnesses (SMI) in developing countries, including India. We examined stability and change in work status, interest in work, problems and benefits related to work among employed participants, and barriers and desired job supports among unemployed participants.
METHODS: We conducted a one-year follow-up with 550 participants with SMI receiving psychiatric outpatient treatment in two hospitals in two districts in India. A total of 459 (83.5%) participants completed follow-up interviews.
RESULTS: Rates of employment were stable across the one-year period, with over 60% employed at baseline and follow-up assessment. More than 80% who worked at both assessments were working in the same job for an average duration of 10 years. Among participants who were unemployed at baseline, 16.9% started working at follow-up, an outcome associated with interest in work and efforts to find work at baseline. Interest in work of those unemployed at both assessments was lower at follow-up than baseline, but over 60% of participants wanted to work across both assessments, and endorsed desired supports for their job search.
CONCLUSIONS: There is considerable stability of work in people with SMI in India. Working in the same job for the long term may have contributed to consistent work. Most unemployed participants who wanted to work at baseline were not working at follow-up, and expressed a desire for help with job search, suggesting the need for vocational services to help people with SMI in developing countries obtain employment.
METHODS: We conducted a one-year follow-up with 550 participants with SMI receiving psychiatric outpatient treatment in two hospitals in two districts in India. A total of 459 (83.5%) participants completed follow-up interviews.
RESULTS: Rates of employment were stable across the one-year period, with over 60% employed at baseline and follow-up assessment. More than 80% who worked at both assessments were working in the same job for an average duration of 10 years. Among participants who were unemployed at baseline, 16.9% started working at follow-up, an outcome associated with interest in work and efforts to find work at baseline. Interest in work of those unemployed at both assessments was lower at follow-up than baseline, but over 60% of participants wanted to work across both assessments, and endorsed desired supports for their job search.
CONCLUSIONS: There is considerable stability of work in people with SMI in India. Working in the same job for the long term may have contributed to consistent work. Most unemployed participants who wanted to work at baseline were not working at follow-up, and expressed a desire for help with job search, suggesting the need for vocational services to help people with SMI in developing countries obtain employment.