MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1080/10400435.2008.10131929

Медицинская библиотека · Assistive technology : the official journal of RESNA · 2008

A retrospective analysis of recommendations for workplace accommodations for persons with mobility and sensory limitations.

Sabata Dory, Williams Michael D, Milchus Karen, Baker Paul M A, Sanford Jon A

СтатьяПоддержка правительства СШАПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

Many studies of workplace accommodations have primarily focused on a particular disability or functional limitation. The need exists for a broad-based study of the types and frequency of accommodations recommended for a variety of functional limitations, including multiple limitations. The researchers conducted a retrospective analysis of 266 persons who received vocational rehabilitation assessment to determine the frequency and types of recommended workplace accommodations. Computer systems/components and special tools/furnishings were the most frequently reported types of recommendations, regardless of functional limitation, whereas adaptive strategies were least likely to be suggested. In general, most job accommodation recommendations targeted the individual work space and were intended to assist in the completion of specific job tasks. Findings indicate that recommendations for workplace accommodations were surprisingly similar across all functional limitation groups.

Для цитирования: Sabata Dory, Williams Michael D, Milchus Karen, Baker Paul M A, Sanford Jon A. A retrospective analysis of recommendations for workplace accommodations for persons with mobility and sensory limitations.. Assistive technology : the official journal of RESNA. 2008. DOI: 10.1080/10400435.2008.10131929.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.