MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1007/s10926-006-9053-0

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of occupational rehabilitation · 2006

Economic evaluation of a multi-stage return to work program for workers on sick-leave due to low back pain.

Steenstra Ivan A, Anema Johannes R, van Tulder Maurits W, Bongers Paulien M, de Vet Henrica C W, van Mechelen Willem

СтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the cost-effectiveness and cost-utility of a return to work (RTW) program for workers on sick-leave due to low back pain (LBP), comparing a workplace intervention implemented between 2 to 8 weeks of sick-leave with usual care, and a clinical intervention after 8 weeks of sick-leave with usual care.

DESIGN

Economic evaluation alongside a randomised controlled trial (RCT).

STUDY POPULATION: Workers sick-listed for a period of 2 to 6 weeks due to LBP.

INTERVENTIONS: 1. workplace assessment, work modifications and case management). 2. physiotherapy based on operant behavioural principles. 3. usual care: provided by an occupational physician.

OUTCOMES: The primary outcome was return to work (RTW). Other outcomes were pain intensity, functional status, quality of life and general health. The economic evaluation was conducted from a societal perspective. Outcomes were assessed at baseline (after 2-6 weeks on sick-leave), and 12 weeks, 26 weeks, and 52 weeks after the first day of sick-leave.

RESULTS

The workplace intervention group returned to work 30.0 days (95% CI=[3.1, 51.3]) earlier on average than the usual care group at slightly higher direct costs (ratio of 1 day: 19 euro). Workers in the clinical intervention group that had received usual care in the first 8 weeks returned to work 21.3 days (95% CI= [-74.1, 29.2]) later on average. The group that had received the workplace intervention in the first 8 weeks and the clinical intervention after 8 weeks returned to work 50.9 days (95% CI=[-89.4, -2.7]) later on average. A workplace intervention was more effective than usual care in RTW at slightly higher costs and was equally effective as usual care at equal costs on other outcomes. A clinical intervention was less effective than usual care and associated with higher costs.

CONCLUSION

The workplace intervention results in a safe and faster RTW than usual care at reasonable costs for workers on sick-leave for two to six weeks due to LBP.

Для цитирования: Steenstra Ivan A, Anema Johannes R, van Tulder Maurits W, Bongers Paulien M, de Vet Henrica C W, van Mechelen Willem. Economic evaluation of a multi-stage return to work program for workers on sick-leave due to low back pain.. Journal of occupational rehabilitation. 2006. DOI: 10.1007/s10926-006-9053-0.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.