Journal of allied health · 2004
Effects of profession and facility type on research utilization by rehabilitation professionals.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Pain Kerrie, Magill-Evans Joyce, Darrah Johanna, Hagler Paul, Warren Sharon
Аннотация
Information about the use of research by rehabilitation professionals to make clinical decisions in everyday practice is limited. This study compared perceived research use and knowledge sources across professions, practice situations, and work environments. Participants were 165 randomly selected Canadian occupational therapists, physical therapists, and speech-language pathologists. Self-report ratings during an interview, an interviewer rating, and questionnaire scores (Edmonton Research Orientation Survey, General Use of Research, Knowledge Acquisition Survey) were compared. Speech-language pathologists had the most education and the highest research use ratings. Research use was highest during program planning. Programs to encourage research use must consider the research available to guide practice and therapists' education level. Facility size and location (rural, urban) do not affect perceived research use.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
AlbertaAnalysis of VarianceAttitude to HealthEducation, ContinuingEvidence-Based MedicineHealth Services ResearchHumansInformation ServicesInstitutional PracticeOccupational TherapyPhysical Therapy SpecialtyProfessional CompetenceRandom AllocationRehabilitation, VocationalSpeech-Language PathologySurveys and Questionnaires