MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1002/epi.70352

Медицинская библиотека · Epilepsia · 2026

Accuracy of the rapid-response electroencephalography's Automated Seizure Burden Estimator: A follow-up validation study of version 8 (AccuRASE II).

Sheikh Zubeda B, Fong Michael W K, Dhakar Monica B, Fang Wei, Ayub Neishay, Molino Janine, Haider Hiba A, Foreman Brandon, Gilmore Emily J, Mizrahi Moshe, Karakis Ioannis, Schmitt Sarah, Osman Gamaleldin, Yoo Ji Yeoun, Hirsch Lawrence J

СтатьяВалидационное исследованиеПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

Ceribell Inc.'s point-of-care electroencephalographic (EEG) system and artificial intelligence-based Automated Seizure Burden Estimator (ASBE; ClarityPro) have US Food and Drug Administration clearance for diagnosing electrographic status epilepticus (ESE). The AccuRASE study using ASBE version 6 (V6) showed high negative predictive value (NPV) but limited sensitivity and positive predictive value (PPV) at certain thresholds. Version 8 (V8) is the updated algorithm trained with additional EEG samples.

METHODS

We tested V8 on the previously used rapid-response EEG test dataset (not used to train V8). Sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV were compared against blinded expert annotations. ESE, ESE and possible ESE (ESE/pESE), electrographic seizures (ESz), and Esz with highly epileptiform patterns (Esz/HEPs) at burden thresholds of >1%, >10%, >20%, >50%, and >90% were analyzed. Additionally, we evaluated the built-in ESE and ESE/pESE alerts (≥90% over 5 min, ≥20% over 1 h, or ≥10 continuous minutes of seizure).

RESULTS

V8 showed 100% sensitivity at lower thresholds (>10%-20%) for ESE (V6 .86), without a specificity loss (V8 .9 vs. V6 .85), and retained NPV (V8 1.0 vs. V6 .99). Sensitivity at 50% threshold was .86 for ESE (V6 .71), and specificity was .94 (V6 .91); PPV for ESE was 30% for ESE and 80% for ESE/pESE. The specificity for ESE remained high for 90% burden (V8 .96, V6 .97) but the sensitivity dropped (.29 vs. V6 .43). Sensitivity was lower for ESz/HEPs (.54 → .44 at >10% threshold), although the algorithm is not designed to detect HEPs. Built-in alert analysis showed significantly improved sensitivity for ESE (.57 → .86); specificity and NPV remained high (>.94).

SIGNIFICANCE: ASBE V8 showed meaningful improvements in sensitivity, continued excellent NPV, and improved built-in alert accuracy for ESE and ESE/pESE. The best seizure burden threshold for ruling out ESE now is 20% (vs. 10% with V6) and that for ruling in ESE/pESE with reasonable certainty is 50% (vs. 90% with V6).

Для цитирования: Sheikh Zubeda B, Fong Michael W K, Dhakar Monica B, Fang Wei, Ayub Neishay, Molino Janine, Haider Hiba A, Foreman Brandon, Gilmore Emily J, Mizrahi Moshe, Karakis Ioannis, Schmitt Sarah, Osman Gamaleldin, Yoo Ji Yeoun, Hirsch Lawrence J. Accuracy of the rapid-response electroencephalography's Automated Seizure Burden Estimator: A follow-up validation study of version 8 (AccuRASE II).. Epilepsia. 2026. DOI: 10.1002/epi.70352.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.