Neurodegenerative disease management · 2026
Supporting gastrostomy decision-making in motor neurone disease (MND): an Australian survey of healthcare professionals' beliefs, practices, and needs.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
El-Wahsh Sarah, Bogart Elise, Bonnor Susannah, El-Wahsh Shadi, Graco Marnie, Hogden Anne, Paynter Camille, Raykar Veena, Signorelli Monique, Thomson Emma, Vucic Steve, White Sean
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: Gastrostomy decision-making for people living with motor neurone disease (MND) is complex. While international studies report healthcare professionals' (HCPs) beliefs and practices in this area, little is known about the Australian context.
AIM: To examine Australian HCPs' beliefs, clinical practices, and support needs regarding gastrostomy decision-making in MND.
METHODS: A national cross-sectional online survey of Australian HCPs involved in gastrostomy discussions (n = 123) was conducted, exploring five domains: 1) initiating discussions and timing; 2) patient education; 3) multidisciplinary coordination; 4) guideline use; 5) and professional development needs. Descriptive statistics were applied.
RESULTS: Most HCPs initiated discussions about gastrostomy (74%), commonly prompted by swallowing difficulty, weight loss, or patient request. Although 72% believed discussions should occur before clinical indications, only 40% reported doing so. Earlier placement was favored in the context of respiratory decline compared with swallowing impairment, and 56% considered gastrostomy to be performed too late. Almost 40% used no formal guidelines, and 74% wanted further professional development.
CONCLUSION: Australian HCPs valued person-centered practice, but belief-practice gaps highlight opportunities to improve consistency, timing, and quality of gastrostomy decision-making support. Enhanced national guidelines, improved multidisciplinary communication, and targeted professional development may help reduce delays and better align practice with evidence-based recommendations.
AIM: To examine Australian HCPs' beliefs, clinical practices, and support needs regarding gastrostomy decision-making in MND.
METHODS: A national cross-sectional online survey of Australian HCPs involved in gastrostomy discussions (n = 123) was conducted, exploring five domains: 1) initiating discussions and timing; 2) patient education; 3) multidisciplinary coordination; 4) guideline use; 5) and professional development needs. Descriptive statistics were applied.
RESULTS: Most HCPs initiated discussions about gastrostomy (74%), commonly prompted by swallowing difficulty, weight loss, or patient request. Although 72% believed discussions should occur before clinical indications, only 40% reported doing so. Earlier placement was favored in the context of respiratory decline compared with swallowing impairment, and 56% considered gastrostomy to be performed too late. Almost 40% used no formal guidelines, and 74% wanted further professional development.
CONCLUSION: Australian HCPs valued person-centered practice, but belief-practice gaps highlight opportunities to improve consistency, timing, and quality of gastrostomy decision-making support. Enhanced national guidelines, improved multidisciplinary communication, and targeted professional development may help reduce delays and better align practice with evidence-based recommendations.