Disability and rehabilitation · 2026
Exploring the perceived barriers and facilitators for accessing audiology services in Malaysia by adults with hearing loss: a qualitative study using the COM-B model.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Romli Maziah, Anantharaman Divya, Dawes Piers, Timmer Barbra H B
Аннотация
PURPOSE: This study explored barriers and facilitators to accessing audiology services among adults with hearing loss in Malaysia, using the COM-B model.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A qualitative study with semi-structured interviews. Twenty-two adults with self-reported hearing loss were recruited from public hospitals, private hearing centres and community outreach across urban and rural areas, including those who had not accessed audiology services.
RESULTS: Key barriers included lack of awareness and knowledge about hearing loss and services (psychological capability), financial constraints (physical opportunity), and stigma related to hearing aids (social opportunity). Facilitators included family support (social opportunity), community outreach (physical opportunity), and availability of public funding to access hearing services (physical opportunity).
CONCLUSION: Improving access to audiology services requires addressing interacting personal, social, and systemic factors. Strategies such as public awareness initiatives, improved professional training, and expanded eligibility for publicly funded hearing care may enhance service uptake. Findings are relevant to Malaysia and may also inform efforts to improve access to hearing care in other low- and middle-income countries facing similar challenges.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A qualitative study with semi-structured interviews. Twenty-two adults with self-reported hearing loss were recruited from public hospitals, private hearing centres and community outreach across urban and rural areas, including those who had not accessed audiology services.
RESULTS: Key barriers included lack of awareness and knowledge about hearing loss and services (psychological capability), financial constraints (physical opportunity), and stigma related to hearing aids (social opportunity). Facilitators included family support (social opportunity), community outreach (physical opportunity), and availability of public funding to access hearing services (physical opportunity).
CONCLUSION: Improving access to audiology services requires addressing interacting personal, social, and systemic factors. Strategies such as public awareness initiatives, improved professional training, and expanded eligibility for publicly funded hearing care may enhance service uptake. Findings are relevant to Malaysia and may also inform efforts to improve access to hearing care in other low- and middle-income countries facing similar challenges.