Neurourology and urodynamics · 2026
Decision-Making Process of Healthcare Providers Regarding Catheterization Method: A Nationwide Survey Study.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Christiaans Coen Huibert Harry, van Veen Felice Emanuela Espèrance, Scheepe Jeroen Ronald, Blok Bertil Freddo Maarten
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: The decision on which catheterization method to prescribe should be made on an individual basis, considering each patient's individual needs and circumstances. However, the current decision-making process regarding assisted bladder drainage might not be transparent or standardized.
OBJECTIVES: The aim of the present study was to explore and compare the decision-making processes of Dutch healthcare providers regarding the choice of catheterization method and relevant bladder management. This information is crucial in the empowerment of patient involvement and the development of a catheter decision aid.
DESIGN & METHODS: We conducted a nationwide survey study including urologists, rehabilitation doctors, physician assistants, and specialized (continence)nurses. A 12-question survey was distributed regarding the decision-making process, including questions about treatment options discussed and factors upon which healthcare providers base their decisions.
RESULTS: A total of 108 healthcare providers responded (response rate 36%). The majority were (continence)nurses or urologists and worked in a hospital. (Continence)nurses were least often involved in the decision-making, and when involved, 53% did not discuss potential other treatment options for the underlying causes of impaired bladder emptying. Most healthcare providers base their decision on the patient characteristics.
CONCLUSION: We observed differences in the decision-making process between the healthcare providers. Implementing shared decision-making can lead to more effective collaboration between the patient and healthcare provider when selecting the most appropriate type of bladder management. This could be achieved through comprehensive training supplemented by a validated decision aid.
OBJECTIVES: The aim of the present study was to explore and compare the decision-making processes of Dutch healthcare providers regarding the choice of catheterization method and relevant bladder management. This information is crucial in the empowerment of patient involvement and the development of a catheter decision aid.
DESIGN & METHODS: We conducted a nationwide survey study including urologists, rehabilitation doctors, physician assistants, and specialized (continence)nurses. A 12-question survey was distributed regarding the decision-making process, including questions about treatment options discussed and factors upon which healthcare providers base their decisions.
RESULTS: A total of 108 healthcare providers responded (response rate 36%). The majority were (continence)nurses or urologists and worked in a hospital. (Continence)nurses were least often involved in the decision-making, and when involved, 53% did not discuss potential other treatment options for the underlying causes of impaired bladder emptying. Most healthcare providers base their decision on the patient characteristics.
CONCLUSION: We observed differences in the decision-making process between the healthcare providers. Implementing shared decision-making can lead to more effective collaboration between the patient and healthcare provider when selecting the most appropriate type of bladder management. This could be achieved through comprehensive training supplemented by a validated decision aid.