Female pelvic medicine & reconstructive surgery · 2018
Successful Treatment of Paradoxical Puborectalis Contraction and Intractable Anorectal Pain With Sacral Neuromodulation.
Клинический случайСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Roth Ted M
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Paradoxical puborectalis contraction (PPC) is a syndrome of obstructed defecation associated with a cluster of complaints including rectal pain, incomplete evacuatory sensation, prolonged repetitive straining with bowel movements, and the need for digital manipulation. Traditional treatment has yielded mixed results.
CASE: We present a case of PPC successfully treated with staged sacral neuromodulation and review her diagnostic features, medical regimen, and prior unsuccessful interventions tried. Symptoms were analyzed using a visual analog scale pain score (0-10). Criteria to progress to implantation of the pulse generator included a pain score less than 3 during test stimulation and/or greater than 50% decrease in the pain score compared to baseline.Our patient had a pain score of 0 (baseline 8) with stage 1 sacral neuromodulation. In addition, she had dramatic relief in her straining with bowel movements and need for digital manipulation. Her pulse generator was implanted after a 2-week trial, and she has experienced a lasting improvement at her follow-up of 2 years.
CONCLUSIONS: Sacral neuromodulation is an established therapy for overactive bladder syndrome, urinary retention, and fecal incontinence. In urology, the use of sacral neuromodulation has been described to benefit some patients with pelvic floor pain. Sacral neuromodulation can be a successful treatment for PPC and functional anorectal pain with resulting improvement in quality of life without the sequelae of an invasive and irreversible surgery.
CASE: We present a case of PPC successfully treated with staged sacral neuromodulation and review her diagnostic features, medical regimen, and prior unsuccessful interventions tried. Symptoms were analyzed using a visual analog scale pain score (0-10). Criteria to progress to implantation of the pulse generator included a pain score less than 3 during test stimulation and/or greater than 50% decrease in the pain score compared to baseline.Our patient had a pain score of 0 (baseline 8) with stage 1 sacral neuromodulation. In addition, she had dramatic relief in her straining with bowel movements and need for digital manipulation. Her pulse generator was implanted after a 2-week trial, and she has experienced a lasting improvement at her follow-up of 2 years.
CONCLUSIONS: Sacral neuromodulation is an established therapy for overactive bladder syndrome, urinary retention, and fecal incontinence. In urology, the use of sacral neuromodulation has been described to benefit some patients with pelvic floor pain. Sacral neuromodulation can be a successful treatment for PPC and functional anorectal pain with resulting improvement in quality of life without the sequelae of an invasive and irreversible surgery.