DOI 10.1186/s12913-025-12790-x
Knowledge, attitudes, and practices towards aphasia among healthcare workers in Anhui, China: a cross-sectional survey.
Аннотация
BACKGROUND
The information on knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP) related to aphasia among Chinese healthcare workers is scarce. This study aimed to assess the KAP related to aphasia among Chinese healthcare workers, and to identify associated sociodemographic factors.
METHODS
An online cross-sectional survey was distributed to tertiary hospitals in Anhui Province, China. Data were collected from April to July 2023 from a total of 119 full-time healthcare workers-comprising doctors, nurses, and therapists-in neurology, rehabilitation, and other aphasia-related departments. KAP scores were the primary metrics, with frequencies and proportions calculated. Mann-Whitney U and Kruskal-Wallis H tests (P <.05) were employed to examine associations between KAP scores and sociodemographic variables.
RESULTS
Participants generally displayed adequate knowledge (mean score: 6.94 ± 0.76), positive attitudes (56.05 ± 6.82), and acceptable practices (13.79 ± 4.60) towards aphasia. Notable gaps were identified in specialized training, personalized treatment strategies, and interdisciplinary collaboration. Sociodemographic factors, such as education, gender, and occupation, were found to correlate with attitudes and practices but not with knowledge. Specifically, males, individuals in rehabilitation departments, and those with doctoral degrees had better KAP scores.
CONCLUSIONS
This inaugural KAP survey on aphasia in China illuminates both the strengths and weaknesses in the current state of aphasia care. Future interventions should focus on targeted strategies that take into account both sociodemographic factors and the gaps identified to optimize aphasia management in China.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.