MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1177/23969873241311821

Медицинская библиотека · European stroke journal · 2025

A systematic review of current national hospital-based stroke registries monitoring access to evidence-based care and patient outcomes.

Leigh Chloe, Gill Jodie, Razak Zainab, Shreyan Shirsho, Cadilhac Dominique A, Kim Joosup, Lannin Natasha A, Dennis Martin, Kapral Moira, Pandian Jeyaraj, Hardianto Yudi, Lin Beilei, Meretoja Atte, Aziz Noor Azah Abd, Schwamm Lee, Norrving Bo, Thapa Lekhjung, Dozier Marshall, Kelavkar Shyam, Mead Gillian

СтатьяСистематический обзорПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

National stroke clinical quality registries/audits support improvements in stroke care. In a 2016 systematic review, 28 registries were identified. Since 2016 there have been important advances in stroke care, including the development of thrombectomy services. Therefore, we sought to understand whether registries have evolved with these advances in care. The aim of this systematic review was to identify current, hospital-based national stroke registries/audits and describe variables (processes, outcome), methods, funding and governance).

METHODS

We searched four databases (21st May 2015 to 1st February 2024), grey literature and stroke organisations' websites. Initially two reviewers screened each citation; when agreement was satisfactory, one of four reviewers screened each citation. The same process was applied to full texts. If there were no new publications from registries identified in the original 2016 review, we contacted the registry leads. We extracted data using predefined categories on country (including income level), clinical/process variables, methods, funding and governance.

RESULTS

We found 37 registries from 31 countries (28 high income, four upper-middle income, five lower-middle income) of which 16 had been identified in 2016 and 21 were new. Twenty-two of the same variables were collected by >50% of registries/audits (mostly acute care, including thrombectomy, and secondary prevention), compared with only four variables in 2016. Descriptions of funding, management, methods of consent and data privacy, follow-up, feedback to hospitals, linkage to other datasets and alignment of variables with guidelines were variably reported. Reasons for apparent termination of some registries was unclear.

CONCLUSIONS

The total number of stroke registries has increased since 2016, and the number of variables collected has increased, reflecting advances in stroke care. However, some registries appeared to have ceased; the reasons are unclear.

Для цитирования: Leigh Chloe, Gill Jodie, Razak Zainab, Shreyan Shirsho, Cadilhac Dominique A, Kim Joosup, Lannin Natasha A, Dennis Martin, Kapral Moira, Pandian Jeyaraj, Hardianto Yudi, Lin Beilei, Meretoja Atte, Aziz Noor Azah Abd, Schwamm Lee, Norrving Bo, Thapa Lekhjung, Dozier Marshall, Kelavkar Shyam, Mead Gillian. A systematic review of current national hospital-based stroke registries monitoring access to evidence-based care and patient outcomes.. European stroke journal. 2025. DOI: 10.1177/23969873241311821.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.