BMC psychiatry · 2024
Perspective matters in recovery: the views of persons with severe mental illness, family and mental health professionals on collaboration during recovery, a qualitative study.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Burger Thijs J, van Eck Robin M, Lachmeijer Marjolein, de Wilde-Schutten Kimriek R G, Lansen Mette, van Alphen Carola, van Haasteren Niek, Groen Karin, Schirmbeck Frederike, Vellinga Astrid, Kikkert Martijn J, Dekker Jack, de Haan Lieuwe, de Koning Mariken B
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Recovery from severe mental illness, including psychosis has been described as a personal and unique process, but it rarely is a journey undertaken without profound influences of significant others (family, mental health professionals). Diverging perspectives between persons with severe mental illness, family and professionals are frequent during the recovery process, notably in psychotic disorders. We aimed to explore processes of collaboration during recovery, to inform recovery supporting practices.
METHODS: Current qualitative study had a participatory design and was set within long-term mental healthcare for severe mental illness. We conducted semi-structured interviews and focus groups with persons with severe mental illness (most had a history of psychosis), family and professionals on their mutual contact during recovery. Using reflexive thematic analysis, we developed themes representing processes of collaboration during recovery.
RESULTS: We described roles persons with severe mental illness, family and professionals attribute to each other in mutually influential terms of unconditional and meaningful contact (which takes time to establish) and problem-oriented aspects. Secondly, experienced differences over problem definition, "needing help" and consequently over the role parties attribute to one another, may result in negative interactions, in the area of having expectations; (not) informing; (not) having agency to change; experiencing (dis)agreement or struggle.
CONCLUSIONS: unconditional, meaningful contact and knowing each other's perspective are important to fruitful interaction in a triad when perspectives on mental health problems diverge. Relationally centered and process oriented care with continuity of family and professionals involved are needed to advance recovery in severe mental illness, especially psychosis.
METHODS: Current qualitative study had a participatory design and was set within long-term mental healthcare for severe mental illness. We conducted semi-structured interviews and focus groups with persons with severe mental illness (most had a history of psychosis), family and professionals on their mutual contact during recovery. Using reflexive thematic analysis, we developed themes representing processes of collaboration during recovery.
RESULTS: We described roles persons with severe mental illness, family and professionals attribute to each other in mutually influential terms of unconditional and meaningful contact (which takes time to establish) and problem-oriented aspects. Secondly, experienced differences over problem definition, "needing help" and consequently over the role parties attribute to one another, may result in negative interactions, in the area of having expectations; (not) informing; (not) having agency to change; experiencing (dis)agreement or struggle.
CONCLUSIONS: unconditional, meaningful contact and knowing each other's perspective are important to fruitful interaction in a triad when perspectives on mental health problems diverge. Relationally centered and process oriented care with continuity of family and professionals involved are needed to advance recovery in severe mental illness, especially psychosis.