MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1513/annalsats.202404-441oc

Медицинская библиотека · Annals of the American Thoracic Society · 2025

Interprofessional Team Staffing in U.S. Intensive Care Units.

Garland Allan, Costa Deena, Wunsch Hannah, Dzierba Amy L, Lizano Danny, Gershengorn Hayley

СтатьяПоддержка NIH: внешняя программаПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

Rationale: There is a paucity of data, and no consensus, about the composition of interdisciplinary teams of healthcare workers (HCWs) who provide care in intensive care units (ICUs).

Objectives

To delineate the nature and variation of HCW staff composition in U.S. adult ICUs before the COVID-19 pandemic.

Methods

A national survey of 574 adult ICUs inquired about ICU staffing. Two sets of survey items asked about 1) "availability to provide care" in ICUs for 11 HCW types, collapsed into six groupings; and 2) the presence in formal ICU clinical rounds of nine HCW types, collapsed into six groupings. Bedside nurses were assumed to be involved in both categories. Analysis was descriptive, seeking to examine the predominant and full range of staffing patterns.

Results

Of surveyed ICUs, 94% were in metropolitan areas, 63% in teaching hospitals, 74% had >250 beds, 66% cared for mixed adult patient types (e.g., medical-surgical), median ICU bed count was 20 (interquartile range, 12-25), and 27% used some form of telemedicine. In addition to bedside nurses, the core staffing group comprised intensivists, respiratory therapists and pharmacists; in 88% of ICUs all were available to provide care. However, there were 28 different combinations of the six groupings (intensivists, respiratory therapists, pharmacists, attending physician support, advanced bedside nurse support, nurse aides), with the most common one, present in 38% of ICUs, including all six. Ninety-six percent of ICUs had interprofessional rounds at least 5 days per week; 78% had them on weekends. Among the ICUs with rounds, 61% of weekday rounding teams included all of intensivists, respiratory therapists, and pharmacists. Nutrition, rehabilitation, and social support practitioners each participated in rounds in 35-80% of ICUs and altogether in 28% of ICUs. Except for intensivists, all HCW types participated much less commonly in weekend than in weekday rounds.

Conclusions

ICU care almost always included a core team of bedside nurses, intensivists, respiratory therapists, and pharmacists. Beyond that core, great variability was seen in the presence of many other HCW types. Almost all ICUs had interprofessional rounds, with three-fourths also having them on weekends.

Для цитирования: Garland Allan, Costa Deena, Wunsch Hannah, Dzierba Amy L, Lizano Danny, Gershengorn Hayley. Interprofessional Team Staffing in U.S. Intensive Care Units.. Annals of the American Thoracic Society. 2025. DOI: 10.1513/annalsats.202404-441oc.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.