Clinical neurophysiology : official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2015
Influence of phasic muscle contraction upon the quadripulse stimulation (QPS) aftereffects.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Kadowaki Suguru, Enomoto Hiroyuki, Murakami Takenobu, Nakatani-Enomoto Setsu, Kobayashi Shunsuke, Ugawa Yoshikazu
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: Contractions of the target muscle influence the aftereffects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS). The aim of this paper is to investigate whether or not voluntary hand movement influences the aftereffects of quadripulse stimulation (QPS) on the hand motor area.
METHODS: Thirteen healthy volunteers participated in this study. After QPS-5 or QPS-50 intervention over the motor hot spot for the right first dorsal interosseous muscle (FDI), the subjects performed voluntary motor tasks (opening-closing right hand movements at 1 Hz for 1 min). We compared the time courses of MEP size between the conditions with and without voluntary movement.
RESULTS: When the subjects moved their hands immediately after QPS, both QPS-5 and QPS-50 aftereffects were abolished. However, if they moved their hands at 20 min after QPS, the long-term aftereffects were preserved.
CONCLUSIONS: Voluntary hand movement applied after intervention influences QPS aftereffects, but the magnitude of the influence depends on the delay between QPS and the voluntary movement.
SIGNIFICANCE: In the plasticity induction experiments, we should always be mindful of the fact that voluntary movement, including the target muscle, seriously influences the induced long-term effects of QPS.
METHODS: Thirteen healthy volunteers participated in this study. After QPS-5 or QPS-50 intervention over the motor hot spot for the right first dorsal interosseous muscle (FDI), the subjects performed voluntary motor tasks (opening-closing right hand movements at 1 Hz for 1 min). We compared the time courses of MEP size between the conditions with and without voluntary movement.
RESULTS: When the subjects moved their hands immediately after QPS, both QPS-5 and QPS-50 aftereffects were abolished. However, if they moved their hands at 20 min after QPS, the long-term aftereffects were preserved.
CONCLUSIONS: Voluntary hand movement applied after intervention influences QPS aftereffects, but the magnitude of the influence depends on the delay between QPS and the voluntary movement.
SIGNIFICANCE: In the plasticity induction experiments, we should always be mindful of the fact that voluntary movement, including the target muscle, seriously influences the induced long-term effects of QPS.