Circulation journal : official journal of the Japanese Circulation Society · 2024
Regional Collaboration for Heart Failure Patients Certified as Needing Support or Care in Long-Term Care Insurance System.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Kinugasa Yoshiharu, Nakamura Kensuke, Hirai Masayuki, Manba Midori, Ishiga Natsuko, Sota Takeshi, Nakayama Natsuko, Ota Tomoki, Kato Masahiko, Adachi Toshiaki, Fukuki Masaharu, Hirota Yutaka, Mizuta Einosuke, Mura Emiko, Nozaka Yoshihito, Omodani Hiroki, Tanaka Hiroaki, Tanaka Yasunori, Watanabe Izuru, Mikami Masaaki, Yamamoto Kazuhiro
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Heart failure (HF) patients with complex care needs often experience exacerbations during the transitional phase as care providers and settings change. Regional collaboration aims to ensure continuity of care; however, its impact on vulnerable patients certified as needing support or care under the Japanese long-term care insurance (LTCI) system remains unclear.
METHODS AND RESULTS: We implemented a regional collaborative program for HF patients involving 3 pillars of transitional care with general practitioners and nursing care facilities: (1) standardized health monitoring using a patient diary and identification of exacerbation warning signs; (2) standardized information sharing among care providers; and (3) standardized HF management manuals. We evaluated outcomes within 1 year of discharge for patients hospitalized with HF and referred to other facilities for outpatient follow-up in 2017-2018 before program implementation (n=110) and in 2019-2020 after implementation (n=126). Patients with LTCI frequently received non-cardiologist follow up and care services and had a higher risk of all-cause mortality and HF readmission compared with those without LTCI (P<0.05). Program implementation was significantly associated with a greater reduction in HF readmissions among patients with LTCI compared with those without (P<0.05 for interaction), although mortality rates remained unchanged.
CONCLUSIONS: A regional collaborative program significantly reduces HF readmissions in HF patients with LTCI who are at high risk of worsening HF.
METHODS AND RESULTS: We implemented a regional collaborative program for HF patients involving 3 pillars of transitional care with general practitioners and nursing care facilities: (1) standardized health monitoring using a patient diary and identification of exacerbation warning signs; (2) standardized information sharing among care providers; and (3) standardized HF management manuals. We evaluated outcomes within 1 year of discharge for patients hospitalized with HF and referred to other facilities for outpatient follow-up in 2017-2018 before program implementation (n=110) and in 2019-2020 after implementation (n=126). Patients with LTCI frequently received non-cardiologist follow up and care services and had a higher risk of all-cause mortality and HF readmission compared with those without LTCI (P<0.05). Program implementation was significantly associated with a greater reduction in HF readmissions among patients with LTCI compared with those without (P<0.05 for interaction), although mortality rates remained unchanged.
CONCLUSIONS: A regional collaborative program significantly reduces HF readmissions in HF patients with LTCI who are at high risk of worsening HF.