Journal of endodontics · 2015
Elastic limits in torsion of reciprocating nickel-titanium instruments.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Ha Jung-Hong, Kim Seo-Ryeong, Versluis Antheunis, Cheung Gary Shun-Pan, Kim Jin-Woon, Kim Hyeon-Cheol
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: Reciprocating angle and torsional load at the superelastic limit were investigated for nickel-titanium (NiTi) instruments used with reciprocating movements.
METHODS: Two reciprocating NiTi instruments (Reciproc R25 [VDW, Munich, Germany] and WaveOne Primary [Dentsply Maillefer, Ballaigues, Switzerland]) and ProTaper F2 (Dentsply Maillefer) were tested for 2 torsional conditions using a custom-designed testing device. Rotational angles were applied, and generated torque values were recorded. The first test condition fixed the files at 5 mm and repetitively rotated them with gradually increasing angles up to 250° (n = 10). The second test subjected the files to a single continuous rotation until fracture (n = 10). The superelastic limits of the instruments were determined from their torque-rotation curves. Statistical analysis was performed (Kruskal-Wallis) at a 95% significance level. The tested specimens were examined under a scanning electron microscope.
RESULTS: It was found that the angle at the superelastic limit was higher for R25 and Primary files than the ProTaper file (P < .05). Repetitive torsional loading with a gradually increasing rotational angle reduced the torsional resistance compared with the single rotation motion. At the 5-mm fixation level all files had superelastic limit angles higher than the 170° set in the dedicated reciprocating motor. The scanning electron microscopic analysis showed features of torsional failure.
CONCLUSIONS: Under the conditions of this study, the 170° set angle of dedicated motors for reciprocating file systems is safe at the 5-mm level. Reuse of reciprocating systems, even with the movements within the elastic limit, may cause deterioration of the instruments.
METHODS: Two reciprocating NiTi instruments (Reciproc R25 [VDW, Munich, Germany] and WaveOne Primary [Dentsply Maillefer, Ballaigues, Switzerland]) and ProTaper F2 (Dentsply Maillefer) were tested for 2 torsional conditions using a custom-designed testing device. Rotational angles were applied, and generated torque values were recorded. The first test condition fixed the files at 5 mm and repetitively rotated them with gradually increasing angles up to 250° (n = 10). The second test subjected the files to a single continuous rotation until fracture (n = 10). The superelastic limits of the instruments were determined from their torque-rotation curves. Statistical analysis was performed (Kruskal-Wallis) at a 95% significance level. The tested specimens were examined under a scanning electron microscope.
RESULTS: It was found that the angle at the superelastic limit was higher for R25 and Primary files than the ProTaper file (P < .05). Repetitive torsional loading with a gradually increasing rotational angle reduced the torsional resistance compared with the single rotation motion. At the 5-mm fixation level all files had superelastic limit angles higher than the 170° set in the dedicated reciprocating motor. The scanning electron microscopic analysis showed features of torsional failure.
CONCLUSIONS: Under the conditions of this study, the 170° set angle of dedicated motors for reciprocating file systems is safe at the 5-mm level. Reuse of reciprocating systems, even with the movements within the elastic limit, may cause deterioration of the instruments.