MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1513/annalsats.202108-932oc

Медицинская библиотека · Annals of the American Thoracic Society · 2022

Comparing Self-Management Programs with and without Peer Support among Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Clinical Trial.

Aboumatar Hanan, Garcia Morales Emmanuel E, Jager Leah R, Naqibuddin Mohammad, Kim Samuel, Saunders Jamia, Bone Lee, Linnell John, McBurney Marjorie, Neiman Joseph, Riley Margaret, Robinson Nancy, Rand Cynthia, Wise Robert

СтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

Rationale: Self-management support (SMS) is an essential component of care for patients who have chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), but there is little evidence on how to provide SMS most effectively to these patients. Peer support (i.e., support provided by a person with a similar medical condition) has been successfully used to promote self-management among patients with various chronic conditions, yet no randomized studies have focused on testing its effects for patients with COPD.

Objectives

To assess whether adding peer support to healthcare professional (HCP) support to help patients with COPD self-management results in better health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and less acute care use.

Methods

A two-arm randomized controlled trial was performed at one academic and one community hospital and their affiliate clinics. The study population included patients aged ⩾40 years who had been diagnosed with COPD by a physician and were currently receiving daily treatment for it. Two self-management support strategies were compared over 6 months. One strategy relied on the HCP for COPD self-management (HCP support); the other used a dual approach involving both HCPs and peer supporters (HCP Plus Peer). The primary outcome was change in HRQoL measured by the St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire at 6 months (range, 0-100, lower is better; four-point meaningful difference). Secondary outcomes included COPD-related and all-cause hospitalizations and emergency department visits. Analysis was conducted under intention to treat.

Results

The number of enrolled participants was 292. Mean age was 67.7 (standard deviation, 9.4) years; 70.9% of participants were White, and 61.3% were female. St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire scores were not significantly different between the study arms at 6 months. HCP Plus Peer arm participants had fewer COPD-related acute care events at 3 months (incidence rate ratio, 0.68; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.50-0.93) and 6 months (incidence rate ratio, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.71-0.99).

Conclusions

Adding peer support to HCP support to help patients self-manage COPD did not further improve HRQoL in this study. However, it did result in fewer COPD-related acute care events during the 6-month intervention period. Clinical trial registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT02891200).

Для цитирования: Aboumatar Hanan, Garcia Morales Emmanuel E, Jager Leah R, Naqibuddin Mohammad, Kim Samuel, Saunders Jamia, Bone Lee, Linnell John, McBurney Marjorie, Neiman Joseph, Riley Margaret, Robinson Nancy, Rand Cynthia, Wise Robert. Comparing Self-Management Programs with and without Peer Support among Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Clinical Trial.. Annals of the American Thoracic Society. 2022. DOI: 10.1513/annalsats.202108-932oc.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.