Restorative neurology and neuroscience · 2006
Repetitive optokinetic stimulation induces lasting recovery from visual neglect.
Клиническое исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Kerkhoff G, Keller I, Ritter V, Marquardt C
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To evaluate whether repetitive optokinetic stimulation with active pursuit eye movements leads to substantial and greater recovery from visual neglect as compared to conventional visual scanning training.
METHODS: Two groups of five patients with leftsided hemineglect were consecutively collected and matched for clinical and demographic variables as well as neglect severity. One group received five treatment sessions of repetitive optokinetic stimulation (R-OKS) within one week, while the other group received the same amount of conventional visual scanning training (VST) using identical visual stimuli and setup. All patients were treated in a single-subject baseline design with treatment-free intervals before (14 days) and after specific neglect therapy (14 days). Dependent variables were the improvements in digit cancellation, visuoperceptual and visuomotor line bisection and visual size distortion during treatment. The transfer of treatment effects was assessed by a paragraph reading test.
RESULTS: The results showed superior effects of OKS treatment in all five patients which generalized across all tasks administered and remained stable at follow-up. In contrast, no significant improvements were obtained after VST training in any of these tasks, except in line bisection.
CONCLUSION: We conclude that the presentation of moving visual stimulus displays with active smooth pursuit eye movements can be more efficient than conventional visual scanning training using static visual displays.
METHODS: Two groups of five patients with leftsided hemineglect were consecutively collected and matched for clinical and demographic variables as well as neglect severity. One group received five treatment sessions of repetitive optokinetic stimulation (R-OKS) within one week, while the other group received the same amount of conventional visual scanning training (VST) using identical visual stimuli and setup. All patients were treated in a single-subject baseline design with treatment-free intervals before (14 days) and after specific neglect therapy (14 days). Dependent variables were the improvements in digit cancellation, visuoperceptual and visuomotor line bisection and visual size distortion during treatment. The transfer of treatment effects was assessed by a paragraph reading test.
RESULTS: The results showed superior effects of OKS treatment in all five patients which generalized across all tasks administered and remained stable at follow-up. In contrast, no significant improvements were obtained after VST training in any of these tasks, except in line bisection.
CONCLUSION: We conclude that the presentation of moving visual stimulus displays with active smooth pursuit eye movements can be more efficient than conventional visual scanning training using static visual displays.