MedElevator
Войти в исследования Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2023
Comparing internal versus external carotid artery branch delivery of intraarterial chemotherapy for the treatment of retinoblastoma.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Chang Emily, Zhou Yunshu, Musch David, Edmonds Amy, Sedig Laura, Hutchinson Raymond, Chaudhary Neeraj, Demirci Hakan
Аннотация
PURPOSE: The goal of this study was to compare the efficacy of intraarterial chemotherapy (IAC) for retinoblastoma delivered via the ophthalmic artery (OA) division of the internal carotid artery (ICA) versus alternative branches of the external carotid artery (ECA).
METHODS: We performed a retrospective chart review of patients receiving IAC for retinoblastoma at a single institution. Subjects were divided into three groups: those that received IAC solely through the OA branch of the ICA, those that initially received IAC through the OA branch of the ICA but were later switched to the ECA, and those that only received IAC through the ECA. The main outcomes compared included globe salvage rate and reduction in tumor thickness and size.
RESULTS: A total of 30 eyes from 26 patients were included. A total of 91 (58%) sessions of IAC were performed through the OA division of the ICA and 65 (42%) were performed through branches of the ECA. Eleven eyes (37%) solely received IAC through the OA branch of the ICA, 16 eyes (53%) were converted to ECA treatment, and 3 eyes solely received IAC through branches of the ECA. Statistical analysis did not show any significant difference in globe salvage rate or reduction in tumor thickness and size.
CONCLUSION: The use of alternative approaches for IAC when the OA branch of the ICA catheterization is not feasible allows for safe continued delivery of highly effective IAC, leading to similar outcomes in terms of globe salvage and reduction in tumor size.
METHODS: We performed a retrospective chart review of patients receiving IAC for retinoblastoma at a single institution. Subjects were divided into three groups: those that received IAC solely through the OA branch of the ICA, those that initially received IAC through the OA branch of the ICA but were later switched to the ECA, and those that only received IAC through the ECA. The main outcomes compared included globe salvage rate and reduction in tumor thickness and size.
RESULTS: A total of 30 eyes from 26 patients were included. A total of 91 (58%) sessions of IAC were performed through the OA division of the ICA and 65 (42%) were performed through branches of the ECA. Eleven eyes (37%) solely received IAC through the OA branch of the ICA, 16 eyes (53%) were converted to ECA treatment, and 3 eyes solely received IAC through branches of the ECA. Statistical analysis did not show any significant difference in globe salvage rate or reduction in tumor thickness and size.
CONCLUSION: The use of alternative approaches for IAC when the OA branch of the ICA catheterization is not feasible allows for safe continued delivery of highly effective IAC, leading to similar outcomes in terms of globe salvage and reduction in tumor size.