BMJ supportive & palliative care · 2021
Group-led creative writing and behavioural health in cancer: a randomised clinical trial.
Клиническое исследование II фазыСтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Nesterova Darya, Zhu Junjia, Kramer Courtney, Vasekar Monali, Truica Cristina, Joshi Aditya, Hayes Michael, Kessler Jolene, Saunders Erika F H, Drabick Joseph J, Joshi Monika
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Cancer diagnosis can adversely affect mental well-being and overall clinical outcome. We evaluated the efficacy of a group-led creative writing workshop (CWW) on mood in patients with cancer prospectively.
METHODS: We conducted a single-institution phase II study. Sixty adult patients with cancer (any type or stage) were randomised 2:1 to CWW (4×CWW sessions, bimonthly over 8 weeks) versus active control (AC) (independent writing at home with the help of a book, four sessions, bimonthly over 8 weeks). The total study duration was 6 months with a follow-up of up to 3 months.
PRIMARY OBJECTIVE: changes in overall mood, depression and anxiety symptoms before and after intervention in both arms. Emotional Thermometer Scale (ETS) was used to assess changes in patients' mood. Additionally, the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ)-9 and General Anxiety Disorder Scale (GAD)-7 were used to evaluate depression and anxiety symptoms.
RESULTS: Of 50 evaluable patients (CWW 34, AC 17), 26 patients in the CWW arm attended at least one class and 19 attended at least four classes. Patients in CWW had significant immediate improvement in the overall ETS (post vs preclass scores; p<0.0001, 95% CI -4.31 to -2.47). Four of the five subscale ETS scores were significantly lower for the CWW arm: distress (p=0.0346, 95% CI -2.6 to -0.1), anxiety (p=0.0366, 95% CI -4.1 to -0.2), depression (p=0.0441, 95% CI -3.9 to -0.1) and anger (p=0.0494, 95% CI -3.3 to 0). No significant differences were seen in the AC arm. No significant differences were observed in the PHQ-9 or the GAD-7 scores.
CONCLUSION: CWW had a positive effect on mood based on ETS scores, suggesting a potential therapeutic benefit among patients with cancer.
METHODS: We conducted a single-institution phase II study. Sixty adult patients with cancer (any type or stage) were randomised 2:1 to CWW (4×CWW sessions, bimonthly over 8 weeks) versus active control (AC) (independent writing at home with the help of a book, four sessions, bimonthly over 8 weeks). The total study duration was 6 months with a follow-up of up to 3 months.
PRIMARY OBJECTIVE: changes in overall mood, depression and anxiety symptoms before and after intervention in both arms. Emotional Thermometer Scale (ETS) was used to assess changes in patients' mood. Additionally, the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ)-9 and General Anxiety Disorder Scale (GAD)-7 were used to evaluate depression and anxiety symptoms.
RESULTS: Of 50 evaluable patients (CWW 34, AC 17), 26 patients in the CWW arm attended at least one class and 19 attended at least four classes. Patients in CWW had significant immediate improvement in the overall ETS (post vs preclass scores; p<0.0001, 95% CI -4.31 to -2.47). Four of the five subscale ETS scores were significantly lower for the CWW arm: distress (p=0.0346, 95% CI -2.6 to -0.1), anxiety (p=0.0366, 95% CI -4.1 to -0.2), depression (p=0.0441, 95% CI -3.9 to -0.1) and anger (p=0.0494, 95% CI -3.3 to 0). No significant differences were seen in the AC arm. No significant differences were observed in the PHQ-9 or the GAD-7 scores.
CONCLUSION: CWW had a positive effect on mood based on ETS scores, suggesting a potential therapeutic benefit among patients with cancer.