MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций
Медицинская библиотека · Laeknabladid · 1999

[Musculoskeletal symptoms among supermarket workers.].

Sveinsdottir T, Olafsdottir H, Rafnsson V

Аннотация на английскомСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVES

The aim was to study the prevalence of musculoskeletal symptoms among supermarket workers in Iceland with special emphasis on the checkers.

MATERIAL AND

METHODS

The sample was all workers in supermarkets in Reykjavik and Akureyri, which had at least three check-out stations. The sample comprised 653 persons, 448 females and 205 males. The Nordic Questionnaire was mailed to the participants' home addresses. Symptoms of female checkers were compared to symptoms among other workers by Mantel-Haenszel test (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were calculated.

RESULTS

Compared to other females symptoms among the checkers who worked 20 hours or more a week were high for neck (OR=4.0; 95% CI=1.5-10.7), shoulders (OR=4.5; 95% CI=1.4-14.4), upper back (OR=2.3; 95% CI=1.1-4.7) and wrists (OR=1.2; 95% CI=0.4-3.0) when adjusted for age. Taking years at work into account gives similar results. For hips OR was 0.3 (95% CI=0.1-0.9). Women who had jobs with different work tasks, including checker work, had substantially lower prevalence of symptoms compared to women who only did checker work.

CONCLUSIONS

The high prevalence of symptoms from neck, shoulders and upper back among checkers with extended working hours could be related to the repetitive movements which the job demands. It is suggested that those working as checkers should have alternative work tasks and the time at the checkout-stations should be limited.

Для цитирования: Sveinsdottir T, Olafsdottir H, Rafnsson V. [Musculoskeletal symptoms among supermarket workers.].. Laeknabladid. 1999.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.