Sunitinib versus sorafenib plus transarterial chemoembolization for inoperable hepatocellular carcinoma patients.

PURPOSE: To compare sunitinib vs sorafenib plus transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) for inoperable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients.

METHODS

From January 2010 to December 2016, 104 patients with inoperable stage III HCC were included and randomly divided into two groups. Patients in the sunitinib+TACE (SU+TACE) group received sunitinib orally 37.5 mg daily, while patients in the sorafenib+TACE (SO+TACE) group received sorafenib 400 mg twice daily. The two groups were given sunitinib or sorafenib on an interrupted schedule, with a 4-7 days interval before or after TACE sessions. TACE treatment was repeated every 6-8 weeks. Patients were treated for about 4-6 cycles until the occurrence of toxicity or patient refusal, or progressive disease.

RESULTS

The median overall survival (OS) and the median progression-free survival (PFS) in the SO+TACE group were significantly higher than that in the SU+TACE (OS: p=0.017; PFS: p=0.036, respectively). The rates of response and disease control were higher in the SO+TACE group (58%, 79%, respectively) compared to the SU+TACE group (37%, 66%, respectively), although without statistical significance. Regarding the toxicities, we found higher rates of hand-foot skin reaction (HFSR) in the SO+TACE group, while frequent occurrence of thrombocytopenia and neutropenia in the SU+TACE group.

CONCLUSIONS

The SO+TACE regimen was more effective and well tolerated in patients with unresectable stage III HCC compared to the SU+TACE regimen. The SO+TACE regimen may be a better alternative to the current standard regimens.