MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.clgc.2023.04.008

Медицинская библиотека · Clinical genitourinary cancer · 2023

Outcomes of Second-Line Therapies in Patients With Metastatic de Novo and Treatment-Emergent Neuroendocrine Prostate Cancer: A Multi-Institutional Study.

Eule Corbin J, Hu Junxiao, Al-Saad Sulaiman, Collier Katharine, Boland Patrick, Lewis Akeem R, McKay Rana R, Narayan Vivek, Bosse Dominick, Mortazavi Amir, Rose Tracy L, Costello Brian A, Bryce Alan H, Lam Elaine T

Многоцентровое исследованиеСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

De novo neuroendocrine prostate cancer (NEPC) and treatment-emergent neuroendocrine prostate cancer (T-NEPC) are rare diseases with a poor prognosis. After first-line platinum chemotherapy, there is no consensus on second-line treatments.

PATIENTS AND

METHODS

Patients with a pathologic diagnosis of de novo NEPC or T-NEPC between 2000 and 2020 who received first-line platinum and any second-line systemic therapy were selected and standardized clinical data was collected via the electronic health record at each institution. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS) based on second-line therapy. Secondary endpoints included objective response rate (ORR) to second-line therapy, PSA response, and time on treatment.

RESULTS

Fifty-eight patients (32 de novo NEPC, 26 T-NEPC) from 8 institutions were included. At de novo NEPC or T-NEPC diagnosis, the overall cohort had a median age of 65.0 years (IQR 59.2-70.3) and median PSA of 3.0 ng/dL (IQR 0.6-17.9). Following first-line platinum chemotherapy, 21 patients (36.2%) received platinum chemotherapy, 10 (17.2%) taxane monotherapy, 11 (19.0%) immunotherapy, 10 (17.2%) other chemotherapy, and 6 (16.2%) other systemic therapy. Among 41 evaluable patients, the ORR was 23.5%. The mOS after start of second-line therapy was 7.4 months (95% CI 6.1-11.9).

CONCLUSIONS

In this retrospective study, patients with de novo NEPC or T-NEPC who received second-line therapy were treated with wide variety of treatment regimens, reflecting the lack of consensus in this setting. Most patients received chemotherapy-based treatments. Overall prognosis was poor and ORR was low in the second line regardless of treatment choice.

Для цитирования: Eule Corbin J, Hu Junxiao, Al-Saad Sulaiman, Collier Katharine, Boland Patrick, Lewis Akeem R, McKay Rana R, Narayan Vivek, Bosse Dominick, Mortazavi Amir, Rose Tracy L, Costello Brian A, Bryce Alan H, Lam Elaine T. Outcomes of Second-Line Therapies in Patients With Metastatic de Novo and Treatment-Emergent Neuroendocrine Prostate Cancer: A Multi-Institutional Study.. Clinical genitourinary cancer. 2023. DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2023.04.008.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.