MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1161/circulationaha.124.069606

Медицинская библиотека · Circulation · 2024

Topical Versus Intravenous Tranexamic Acid in Patients Undergoing Cardiac Surgery: The DEPOSITION Randomized Controlled Trial.

Lamy André, Sirota Dmitry A, Jacques Frederic, Poostizadeh Ahmad, Noiseux Nicolas, Efremov Sergey, Demers Philippe, Akselrod Boris, Wang Chew Yin, Arora Rakesh C, Branny Piotr, McGuinness Shay P, Brown Craig D, Jeanmart Hugues, Zhao Qiang, Zhang Haibo, Belley-Côté Emilie P, Whitlock Richard P, Browne Austin, Copland Ingrid, Vincent Jessica, Khatun Rutaba, Balasubramanian Kumar, Bangdiwala Shrikant I, McGillion Michael H, Fox-Robichaud Alison E, Spence Jessica, Yusuf Salim, Devereaux P J, DEPOSITION Study Group

СтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеМногоцентровое исследованиеСравнительное исследованиеПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Although intravenous tranexamic acid is used in cardiac surgery to reduce bleeding and transfusion, topical tranexamic acid results in lower plasma concentrations compared with intravenous tranexamic acid, which may lower the risk of seizures. We aimed to determine whether topical tranexamic acid reduces the risk of in-hospital seizure without increasing the risk of transfusion among cardiac surgery patients.

METHODS

We conducted a multicenter, double dummy, blinded, randomized controlled trial of patients recruited by convenience sampling in academic hospitals undergoing cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass. Between September 17, 2019, and November 28, 2023, a total of 3242 patients from 16 hospitals in 6 countries were randomly assigned (1:1 ratio) to receive either intravenous tranexamic acid (control) through surgery or topical tranexamic acid (treatment) at the end of surgery. The primary outcome was seizure, and the secondary outcome was red blood cell transfusion. After the last planned interim analysis, when 75% of anticipated participants had completed follow up, the data and safety monitoring board recommended to terminate the trial, and upon unblinding, the operations committee stopped the trial for safety.

RESULTS

Among 3242 randomized patients (mean age, 66.0 years; 77.7% male), in-hospital seizure occurred in 4 of 1624 patients (0.2%) in the topical group, and 11 of 1628 patients (0.7%) in the intravenous group (absolute risk difference, -0.5% [95% CI, -0.9 to 0.03]; P=0.07). Red blood cell transfusion occurred in 570 patients (35.1%) in the topical group and in 433 (26.8%) in the intravenous group (absolute risk difference, 8.3% [95% CI, 5.2-11.5]; P=0.007). The absolute risk difference in transfusion of ≥4 units of red blood cells in the topical group compared with the intravenous group was 8.2% (95% CI, 3.4-12.9).

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients undergoing cardiac surgery, topical administration of tranexamic acid resulted in an 8.3% absolute increase in transfusion without reducing the incidence of seizure, compared with intravenous tranexamic acid.

REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT03954314.

Для цитирования: Lamy André, Sirota Dmitry A, Jacques Frederic, Poostizadeh Ahmad, Noiseux Nicolas, Efremov Sergey, Demers Philippe, Akselrod Boris, Wang Chew Yin, Arora Rakesh C, Branny Piotr, McGuinness Shay P, Brown Craig D, Jeanmart Hugues, Zhao Qiang, Zhang Haibo, Belley-Côté Emilie P, Whitlock Richard P, Browne Austin, Copland Ingrid, Vincent Jessica, Khatun Rutaba, Balasubramanian Kumar, Bangdiwala Shrikant I, McGillion Michael H, Fox-Robichaud Alison E, Spence Jessica, Yusuf Salim, Devereaux P J, DEPOSITION Study Group. Topical Versus Intravenous Tranexamic Acid in Patients Undergoing Cardiac Surgery: The DEPOSITION Randomized Controlled Trial.. Circulation. 2024. DOI: 10.1161/circulationaha.124.069606.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.