International journal of integrated care · 2026
The Integration of Flexible Assertive Community Treatment with District Social Support Service Teams for Patients with Severe Mental Illness in the Netherlands: A Qualitative Analysis of Team Members' Experiences.
Клинический случайСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Kleijburg Anne, Muusse Christien, Wijnen Ben, Lokkerbol Joran, Candel Pim, Spoelstra S Kor, de Jong E C Marjolijne, Evers Silvia, Kroon Hans
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: To promote recovery of individuals with severe mental illness and reduce fragmentation of care, network partners collaborated to develop a cross-domain, multi-agency approach by integrating Flexible Assertive Community Treatment (FACT) teams with municipal District Social Services (DSS), referred to as FACT+DSS teams.
AIM: To describe how team members experienced the implementation of the FACT+DSS teams by team members, including perceived effects on various themes such as service delivery, network collaboration, the target population, and facilitators and barriers to implementation.
METHODS: A qualitative study using semi-structured interviews (N = 15) was conducted to explore the experiences of team members in two new FACT+DSS teams in the Netherlands using thematic analysis.
RESULTS: The FACT+DSS approach was experienced to improve service access, continuity of care, case-finding and client enrolment (care-avoiders), time efficiency for team members, and strengthen network collaboration. Identified barriers and facilitators underlined the importance of strong leadership, ownership, equality, direct relationships, and professional expertise.
CONCLUSION: Participants experienced the FACT+DSS approach as a highly positive development, improving network collaboration and recovery-oriented care for clients. Our findings may contribute to the development and implementation of FACT (and related practices) as an integrated multi-agency approach.
AIM: To describe how team members experienced the implementation of the FACT+DSS teams by team members, including perceived effects on various themes such as service delivery, network collaboration, the target population, and facilitators and barriers to implementation.
METHODS: A qualitative study using semi-structured interviews (N = 15) was conducted to explore the experiences of team members in two new FACT+DSS teams in the Netherlands using thematic analysis.
RESULTS: The FACT+DSS approach was experienced to improve service access, continuity of care, case-finding and client enrolment (care-avoiders), time efficiency for team members, and strengthen network collaboration. Identified barriers and facilitators underlined the importance of strong leadership, ownership, equality, direct relationships, and professional expertise.
CONCLUSION: Participants experienced the FACT+DSS approach as a highly positive development, improving network collaboration and recovery-oriented care for clients. Our findings may contribute to the development and implementation of FACT (and related practices) as an integrated multi-agency approach.