Journal of community genetics · 2026
"Will it be enough to be respected?": understanding personal, institutional, and societal harms and benefits of genomics research.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Dusic Emerson, Madden Devin, Rios Isabella E, Restar Arjee, Milan Tiq, Patterson Jodie, Pletta David R, Rabinowitz Sima, Ramos Michelle A, A Aguayo-Romero Rodrigo, Baker Kellan, Horowitz Carol R, Reisner Sari L
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Transgender Identity Genomics Research (TIGR)-research examining potential associations between genetic factors and transgender, nonbinary, and gender diverse (trans) identities-takes place in a complex landscape with significant potential to either benefit or harm trans communities. As public and political scrutiny of trans communities intensifies, the stakes and potential impacts of TIGR are heightened and ethical, legal and social implications must be considered. To better understand how those who would be most affected by TIGR view such research, we explored trans adults' perceptions of TIGR in the current environment and how they perceive TIGR may impact their futures.
METHODS: Using a community-based participatory research approach, we partnered with a trans-led Executive Stakeholder Board to conduct in-depth interviews with 31 trans adults in the United States between June-December 2024 and conducted a Reflexive Thematic Analysis.
RESULTS: Participants (mean age=34 years, range=19-73 years; 61% people of color; 39% nonbinary, 39% transgender women, 22% transgender men) identified possible benefits of TIGR such as personal affirmation, increased social acceptance, and improved access to gender-affirming healthcare. They also expressed concerns about potential harms, including further stigmatization, discrimination, and pathologization of trans identities. While most viewed research in trans communities (including TIGR) as a net positive, some participants felt it less useful compared to addressing more urgent, material challenges trans communities face.
CONCLUSION: Our findings underscore that TIGR, like all scientific research, is shaped by the sociopolitical environment. It is imperative that TIGR researchers engage meaningfully and ethically with trans communities to minimize potential harms and center community needs.
METHODS: Using a community-based participatory research approach, we partnered with a trans-led Executive Stakeholder Board to conduct in-depth interviews with 31 trans adults in the United States between June-December 2024 and conducted a Reflexive Thematic Analysis.
RESULTS: Participants (mean age=34 years, range=19-73 years; 61% people of color; 39% nonbinary, 39% transgender women, 22% transgender men) identified possible benefits of TIGR such as personal affirmation, increased social acceptance, and improved access to gender-affirming healthcare. They also expressed concerns about potential harms, including further stigmatization, discrimination, and pathologization of trans identities. While most viewed research in trans communities (including TIGR) as a net positive, some participants felt it less useful compared to addressing more urgent, material challenges trans communities face.
CONCLUSION: Our findings underscore that TIGR, like all scientific research, is shaped by the sociopolitical environment. It is imperative that TIGR researchers engage meaningfully and ethically with trans communities to minimize potential harms and center community needs.