Accelerating Evidence-Based Practices in Acute Kidney Injury: A Consensus Statement from the XXXV ADQI Conference.
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Brown Jeremiah R, Rewa Oleksa G, Rabin Borsika A, Akcan-Arikan Ayse, Awdishu Linda, Bagshaw Sean M, Brookman-Frazee Lauren, Cerda Jorge, Claure-Del Granado Rolando, Ghazi Lama, Goldstein Stuart L, Jeong Rachel, Kashani Kianoush, Koyner Jay L, Liu Kathleen D, Macedo Etienne, Mottes Theresa, Pannu Neesh, Reddy Yuvaram N V, Reis Thiago, See Emily, Selby Nicholas M, Siew Edward D, Silver Samuel A, Srinsawat Nattachai, Stadnick Nicole A, Vijaykumar Aarthi, Wald Ron, Wilson F Perry, Zarbock Alexander, Ronco Claudio, Ostermann Marlies, Mehta Ravindra L, Neyra Javier A
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: 1) Define the current status of IS; 2) Define a roadmap for accelerating IS with a focus on patient/care partner advocacy, digital tool application, social determinants of health, and resource-limited settings; and 3) Develop a robust and broad research agenda incorporating IS methodology into the programs.
EVIDENCE REVIEW: ADQI XXXV was conducted through a modified Delphi process with virtual meetings preceding an in-person meeting. Five workgroups were determined a priori to focus on 1) IS definitions and methods applicable to AKI and acute kidney care; 2) IS literature in AKI and acute kidney care; 3) Innovations in IS to accelerate the adoption, adherence to, and sustainment of EBPs in AKI and acute kidney care; 4) IS methods in resource-limited settings; and 5) Recommendations to identify and evaluate EBPs that are ready for implementation or de-implementation. Prior to the in-person meeting, each workgroup met virtually to review the literature and develop framework questions to address their objectives. During the two-day in person meeting, through iterative discussions, questions and supporting statements were finalized. These questions and statements were agreed upon through voting to achieve consensus, defined as agreement of ≥80%.
CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: We report a structured multidisciplinary consensus for defining the role of IS in AKI and acute kidney care. Future programs should address these consensus questions and apply these statements along with IS methodology in the translation of science into clinical practice and the implementation/de-implementation of EBPs in clinical care.