Effectiveness of AI-Supported Game-Based Learning: A Systematic Review of Outcomes, Challenges, and Future Directions.
Аннотация
BACKGROUND
AI-supported game-based learning (AI-GBL) integrates artificial intelligence mechanisms, including adaptive difficulty adjustment, large language model (LLM) scaffolding, intelligent non-player characters (NPCs), and stealth assessment, into game-based educational environments.
OBJECTIVE
This systematic review synthesizes the empirical evidence on AI-GBL effectiveness, adaptive mechanisms, and intelligent assessment approaches across diverse educational contexts.
METHOD: Following PRISMA 2020 guidelines, 55 peer-reviewed empirical studies (2021-2026) were identified from Web of Science and Scopus databases. Two independent reviewers screened records (κ = 0.89; 100% consensus on disagreements), extracted data using a standardized coding scheme, and assessed methodological quality using a five-criterion rubric. A thematic synthesis approach was adopted due to the heterogeneity of the evidence base.
RESULTS
The reviewed studies generally suggest promising positive effects of AI-GBL on knowledge acquisition, intrinsic motivation, and affective engagement under a range of educational conditions. LLM-based scaffolding reduces cognitive load but risks fostering passive dependency; adaptive difficulty adjustment benefits depend critically on the direction and magnitude of adaptation; AI NPCs function as credible instructional partners in both EFL and STEM contexts; stealth assessment achieves AUCs of 0.848-0.913. Challenges include algorithmic bias in assessment models, LLM latency, over-reliance risks, and a near absence of longitudinal evidence.
CONCLUSIONS
AI-GBL's effectiveness rests on principled alignment between AI mechanisms and learning theory rather than algorithmic sophistication per se. Equity-by-design approaches and longitudinal evidence constitute the field's priority research needs.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.