MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1177/29767342261460412

Медицинская библиотека · Substance use & addiction journal · 2026

Learning Collaboratives in the HEALing Communities Study: An Approach to Providing Training and Technical Assistance.

Rudorf Maria, Baker Trevor, Walker Curtis, Bove Nicholas, Gruss Dawn E, Roemmele Lise, Young April M, Larimore Elizabeth E, Beers Donna, Langis Gary, Sahovey Andrea, Fielman Sarah, Anderson Roxanne, Beard Dacia, Haessler Karen, Weinstein Zoe M, Fitzpatrick Amy, Weiss Roger D, Loukas Vanessa, Taylor Jessica L, Chatterjee Avik, Cruz Rachel Sword, Feldstein Kenneth, Hensel Erika, Calver Katherine, Bridden Carly, Walley Alexander Y

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Reducing opioid overdose death rates across the United States demands novel community partnerships and information sharing to implement and sustain evidence-based opioid overdose prevention strategies. During the NIH-funded HEALing Communities Study, a multisite intervention to reduce opioid overdose deaths, researchers from 4 states (MA, NY, OH, KY) used Learning Collaboratives as part of training and technical assistance. Learning Collaboratives are forums for gathering people with intersecting goals intended to promote peer-based learning and build professional networks.

OBJECTIVES

We described the design, implementation, and lessons learned from Learning Collaboratives, and collected and synthesized data to identify strengths, challenges, and limitations.

METHODS

State research teams developed variable Learning Collaborative delivery and evaluation approaches. Site research staff evaluated similarities and differences between state-specific processes, including: session structure, cadence, topics, attendance, and lessons learned.

RESULTS

From January 2020 to December 2023, 383 Learning Collaborative sessions were completed (MA n = 236; NY n = 96; OH n = 25; KY n = 24; Cross-Site n = 2), each 1 to 2 hours in duration. Learning Collaboratives had a mean attendance of 30 and a median attendance of 17 participants/session, and included frontline workers and clinicians (eg, harm reductionists, community members/leaders, people with lived/living experience, social workers, physicians, advanced practice providers, nurses, pharmacists, criminal legal professionals, and policy and regulatory experts). Attendance was voluntary and unpaid. Learning Collaboratives were designed as individual sessions or series, content- or community-specific, and involved diverse speakers, community cases, and active discussion. Learning Collaboratives supported strategy implementation for 3 evidence-based practices (overdose education and naloxone distribution, medication for opioid use disorder, safer opioid prescribing) and communications campaigns.

CONCLUSIONS

HEALing Communities Study Learning Collaboratives successfully convened interprofessional partners for opioid overdose prevention learning, leveraging local expertise and engagement; responded to community needs, including unexpected current events; and encouraged multidirectional knowledge sharing to foster networks and resource sharing within/across communities to enhance collaboration and improve service delivery.

Для цитирования: Rudorf Maria, Baker Trevor, Walker Curtis, Bove Nicholas, Gruss Dawn E, Roemmele Lise, Young April M, Larimore Elizabeth E, Beers Donna, Langis Gary, Sahovey Andrea, Fielman Sarah, Anderson Roxanne, Beard Dacia, Haessler Karen, Weinstein Zoe M, Fitzpatrick Amy, Weiss Roger D, Loukas Vanessa, Taylor Jessica L, Chatterjee Avik, Cruz Rachel Sword, Feldstein Kenneth, Hensel Erika, Calver Katherine, Bridden Carly, Walley Alexander Y. Learning Collaboratives in the HEALing Communities Study: An Approach to Providing Training and Technical Assistance.. Substance use & addiction journal. 2026. DOI: 10.1177/29767342261460412.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.