MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1177/20543581261468728

Медицинская библиотека · Canadian journal of kidney health and disease · 2026

Defining a High-Quality Living Kidney Donor Evaluation: A Delphi Survey and Consensus Conference Summary Report.

Yohanna Seychelle, Naylor Kyla L, Holtby Linnea, Sontrop Jessica M, Alam Ahsan, Cheal Brent, Dipchand Christine, Garg Amit X, Gill Jagbir, Habbous Steven, Hingwala Jay, John Peggy, King Jessica, Koch Michael, Lam Ngan N, Morrison Scott, Pisapia Christine, Reich Marian, Sandal Shaifali, Settee Craig, Smith Terry, Thibodeau Carrie, van der Linde Lynn, Wang Carol

Клинический случайСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Many living kidney donors (LKDs) describe their evaluation process as the most difficult part of donating a kidney. The process is often lengthy, complex and inefficient, frequently requiring several months to complete. A more efficient and donor-centered evaluation may improve LKD experiences, reduce attrition, and encourage more individuals to donate.

METHODS

We employed a Delphi approach to define and select metrics of a high-quality LKD evaluation. Four multidisciplinary working groups were created in which LKDs (n=8), healthcare professionals (n=11), and administrators (n=3) collaborated to develop evidence and experience informed recommendations.

RESULTS

This work culminated in a national consensus conference held virtually in September 2024, which brought together over 100 LKDs, nurses, nephrologists, surgeons, researchers, and representatives from transplant organizations. Of the 42 recommendations evaluated through the e-Delphi process, 35 achieved consensus (≥75% agreement) across four domains. Ninety-two percent were supported by moderate-quality evidence, while 8% had no supporting evidence, reflecting the limited empirical data available for several aspects of donor evaluation processes. The recommendations clustered into four overarching themes included: (1) increasing donor numbers and evaluation efficiency (e.g., eligibility for donation determined within three to six months), (2) enhancing program resources and donor reimbursement (e.g., metrics on donor financial neutrality), (3) ensuring a donor-centered evaluation process (e.g., donor-centered metrics such as donor satisfaction), and (4) promoting consistency and evidence-based practice across programs (e.g., consistent evaluation nationally).

CONCLUSION

Collectively, these recommendations provide a framework to guide quality improvement, benchmarking, and policy development, with implications for strengthening the LKD evaluation process worldwide.

Для цитирования: Yohanna Seychelle, Naylor Kyla L, Holtby Linnea, Sontrop Jessica M, Alam Ahsan, Cheal Brent, Dipchand Christine, Garg Amit X, Gill Jagbir, Habbous Steven, Hingwala Jay, John Peggy, King Jessica, Koch Michael, Lam Ngan N, Morrison Scott, Pisapia Christine, Reich Marian, Sandal Shaifali, Settee Craig, Smith Terry, Thibodeau Carrie, van der Linde Lynn, Wang Carol. Defining a High-Quality Living Kidney Donor Evaluation: A Delphi Survey and Consensus Conference Summary Report.. Canadian journal of kidney health and disease. 2026. DOI: 10.1177/20543581261468728.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.