MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1017/s1478951526103150

Медицинская библиотека · Palliative & supportive care · 2026

Fertility preservation and the terminally ill patient: A case report with considerations for practice.

Norling Tracey, Tapfield Maureen, Ranse Kristen

СтатьяКлинический случайПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

To raise awareness of fertility preservation and counseling in palliative care and explore considerations for practice.

METHODS

This case report describes the rapid decline and death of a 36-year-old man with astrocytoma. Despite early fertility discussions with the palliative care team, sudden clinical deterioration prevented semen collection prior to death. Following death, the spouse requested post-death sperm retrieval.

RESULTS

Post-death sperm retrieval and cryopreservation were successfully completed within the viability window. To achieve this, urgent interdisciplinary coordination across palliative care, emergency medicine, reproductive specialists, and hospital legal and executive teams was required.

SIGNIFICANCE OF

RESULTS

The case highlights the importance of early and ongoing fertility counseling for patients of reproductive age in palliative care. It demonstrates that clear pathways and coordinated systems can enable post-death sperm retrieval when aligned with patient and partner wishes. The development of evidence-based policies, training, and patient resources may reduce barriers and support clinicians to conduct sensitive, informed fertility discussions.

Для цитирования: Norling Tracey, Tapfield Maureen, Ranse Kristen. Fertility preservation and the terminally ill patient: A case report with considerations for practice.. Palliative & supportive care. 2026. DOI: 10.1017/s1478951526103150.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.