World neurosurgery · 2019
Intraoperative Repair of Cerebrospinal Fluid Rhinorrhea in Skull Base Tumor Resection: A Retrospective Study of Acellular Dermal Matrix Versus Turbinate Flap.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Zhong Bing, Song Ning-Ying, Deng Di, Li Lin-Ke, Du Jin-Tao, Liu Feng, Liu Ya-Feng, Liu Shi-Xi
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: The acellular dermal matrix (ADM) and turbinate flap (TF) have been widely used in the reconstruction of skull base defects. However, owing to the lack of reported data, the therapeutic effects have been controversial. The purpose of the present study was to compare the effect of the ADM and TF on cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) rhinorrhea after nasal endoscopic resection of a skull base tumor.
METHODS: The data from 46 patients who had undergone nasal endoscopic resection of a skull base tumor and repair of CSF rhinorrhea were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were divided into ADM and TF groups according to the difference in repair materials used. We compared and analyzed the intraoperative information and postoperative outcomes.
RESULTS: The operation time, blood loss, defect area, and need for blood transfusion were not significantly different between the ALT and TF groups. The postoperative length of hospital stay (14.33 ± 3.66 vs. 16.76 ± 5.51 days; P = 0.669) and the incidence of complications, including wound infection (1 vs. 0; P = 0.270), intracranial infection (1 vs. 1; P = 0.900), hemorrhage (2 vs. 3; P = 0.788), 15-day CSF leak (1 vs. 2; P = 0.658), and respiratory infection (2 vs. 1; P = 0.450) were comparable between the 2 groups. The 6-month (0 vs. 0; P = 1.000) and 12-month (0 vs. 0; P = 1.000) incidence of recurrence also showed no significant differences.
CONCLUSION: The use of the ADM for patients with CSF rhinorrhea showed comparable results in terms of postoperative outcomes compared with the use of TF. ADM could serve as a safe and feasible alternative for endoscopic repair of CSF rhinorrhea after nasal endoscopic resection of skull base tumors.
METHODS: The data from 46 patients who had undergone nasal endoscopic resection of a skull base tumor and repair of CSF rhinorrhea were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were divided into ADM and TF groups according to the difference in repair materials used. We compared and analyzed the intraoperative information and postoperative outcomes.
RESULTS: The operation time, blood loss, defect area, and need for blood transfusion were not significantly different between the ALT and TF groups. The postoperative length of hospital stay (14.33 ± 3.66 vs. 16.76 ± 5.51 days; P = 0.669) and the incidence of complications, including wound infection (1 vs. 0; P = 0.270), intracranial infection (1 vs. 1; P = 0.900), hemorrhage (2 vs. 3; P = 0.788), 15-day CSF leak (1 vs. 2; P = 0.658), and respiratory infection (2 vs. 1; P = 0.450) were comparable between the 2 groups. The 6-month (0 vs. 0; P = 1.000) and 12-month (0 vs. 0; P = 1.000) incidence of recurrence also showed no significant differences.
CONCLUSION: The use of the ADM for patients with CSF rhinorrhea showed comparable results in terms of postoperative outcomes compared with the use of TF. ADM could serve as a safe and feasible alternative for endoscopic repair of CSF rhinorrhea after nasal endoscopic resection of skull base tumors.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Acellular DermisAdultAgedBlood Loss, SurgicalCerebrospinal Fluid RhinorrheaFemaleHumansIntraoperative ComplicationsMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedNasal CavityNatural Orifice Endoscopic SurgeryNeuroimagingOperative TimePlastic Surgery ProceduresRetrospective StudiesSkull Base NeoplasmsSurgical FlapsTurbinates