The Australian & New Zealand journal of obstetrics & gynaecology · 2019
Comparison of group O Rh(D)- red blood cell use in pregnant women across hospitals of various sizes and obstetric capabilities prior to the introduction of patient blood management guidelines.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Patterson Jillian A, Hirani Rena, Irving David O, Nicholl Michael C, Ford Jane B, Obstetric Transfusion Steering Committee
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: O Rh(D)- red blood cell (RBC) units can generally be transfused to most patients regardless of their ABO blood type and are frequently used during emergency situations. Detailed usage patterns of O Rh(D)- RBC units in obstetric populations have not been well characterised. With the introduction of patient blood management guidelines, historical usage patterns are important for providing comparative data.
AIMS: To determine how the use of O Rh(D)- RBC units in pregnant women differs between hospitals of different sizes and obstetric capabilities prior to patient blood management guidelines.
METHODS: Data from 67 New South Wales public hospital blood banks were linked with hospital and perinatal databases to identify RBC transfusions during pregnancy, birth and postnatally between July 2006 and December 2010. RBC transfusions were divided into O Rh(D)- or other blood types. Hospitals were classified according to birth volume, obstetric capability and location, with transfusions classified by timing and diagnosis.
RESULTS: Of the 12 078 RBC units transfused into pregnant women, 1062 (8.8%) were O Rh(D)-. Higher use of O Rh(D)- RBC units was seen in antenatal transfusions, preterm deliveries and in regional or smaller hospitals. There was wide variation in rates of O Rh(D)- RBC transfusion among hospitals.
CONCLUSIONS: The rate of O Rh(D)- RBC unit use in obstetrics was lower during the period assessed than the nationally reported usage. It is encouraging that O Rh(D)- RBCs were more commonly used in emergency or specialised situations, or in facilities where holding a large blood inventory is not feasible.
AIMS: To determine how the use of O Rh(D)- RBC units in pregnant women differs between hospitals of different sizes and obstetric capabilities prior to patient blood management guidelines.
METHODS: Data from 67 New South Wales public hospital blood banks were linked with hospital and perinatal databases to identify RBC transfusions during pregnancy, birth and postnatally between July 2006 and December 2010. RBC transfusions were divided into O Rh(D)- or other blood types. Hospitals were classified according to birth volume, obstetric capability and location, with transfusions classified by timing and diagnosis.
RESULTS: Of the 12 078 RBC units transfused into pregnant women, 1062 (8.8%) were O Rh(D)-. Higher use of O Rh(D)- RBC units was seen in antenatal transfusions, preterm deliveries and in regional or smaller hospitals. There was wide variation in rates of O Rh(D)- RBC transfusion among hospitals.
CONCLUSIONS: The rate of O Rh(D)- RBC unit use in obstetrics was lower during the period assessed than the nationally reported usage. It is encouraging that O Rh(D)- RBCs were more commonly used in emergency or specialised situations, or in facilities where holding a large blood inventory is not feasible.