Journal of minimally invasive gynecology · 2019
Combined Laparoscopic Uterine Artery Occlusion and Myomectomy versus Laparoscopic Myomectomy: A Direct-Comparison Meta-Analysis of Short- and Long-Term Outcomes in Women with Symptomatic Leiomyomas.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяМетаанализНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Tranoulis Anastasios, Georgiou Dimitra, Alazzam Mo'iad, Borley Jane
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To ascertain the efficacy and safety of laparoscopic uterine artery occlusion (LUAO) during laparoscopic myomectomy (LM) on intra- and postoperative morbidity and to assess its impact on leiomyoma recurrence rates.
DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane Database were searched for relevant references from inception until December 2018, in line with PRISMA guidelines.
METHODS OF STUDY SELECTION: Two authors screened for study eligibility and extracted data. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies (OSs) comparing short- and long-term morbidity of LM with or without LUAO were included. The modified Jadad score and the methodologic index for nonrandomized studies were used to evaluate the quality of RCTs and OSs, respectively.
TABULATION, INTEGRATION, AND RESULTS: Twelve studies encompassing 750 LM and 873 LUAO-LM cases were included in the meta-analysis. The studies were of moderate quality. LUAO-LM appears to significantly decrease intraoperative blood loss, postoperative hemoglobin drop, and blood transfusion rate. A trend toward shorter hospital length of stay was demonstrated, whereas no significant difference in operation duration was observed. The combined procedure seemingly contributes to lower recurrence rate. No LUAO-related complications were reported. Moderate to high heterogeneity was observed for few outcomes.
CONCLUSION: This is the first meta-analysis to date to provide a convincing overview of efficacy and safety of LUAO-LM. Although a medium risk of bias warrants some caution with interpretation of the results, LUAO-LM seemingly improves intra- and postoperative outcomes in women with symptomatic leiomyomas.
DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane Database were searched for relevant references from inception until December 2018, in line with PRISMA guidelines.
METHODS OF STUDY SELECTION: Two authors screened for study eligibility and extracted data. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies (OSs) comparing short- and long-term morbidity of LM with or without LUAO were included. The modified Jadad score and the methodologic index for nonrandomized studies were used to evaluate the quality of RCTs and OSs, respectively.
TABULATION, INTEGRATION, AND RESULTS: Twelve studies encompassing 750 LM and 873 LUAO-LM cases were included in the meta-analysis. The studies were of moderate quality. LUAO-LM appears to significantly decrease intraoperative blood loss, postoperative hemoglobin drop, and blood transfusion rate. A trend toward shorter hospital length of stay was demonstrated, whereas no significant difference in operation duration was observed. The combined procedure seemingly contributes to lower recurrence rate. No LUAO-related complications were reported. Moderate to high heterogeneity was observed for few outcomes.
CONCLUSION: This is the first meta-analysis to date to provide a convincing overview of efficacy and safety of LUAO-LM. Although a medium risk of bias warrants some caution with interpretation of the results, LUAO-LM seemingly improves intra- and postoperative outcomes in women with symptomatic leiomyomas.