MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.eururo.2017.08.028

Медицинская библиотека · European urology · 2017

Robot-assisted Kidney Transplantation: The European Experience.

Breda Alberto, Territo Angelo, Gausa Luis, Tuğcu Volkan, Alcaraz Antonio, Musquera Mireia, Decaestecker Karel, Desender Liesbeth, Stockle Michael, Janssen Martin, Fornara Paolo, Mohammed Nasreldin, Siena Giampaolo, Serni Sergio, Guirado Luis, Facundo Carma, Doumerc Nicolas

СтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеНаблюдательное исследованиеПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Robot-assisted kidney transplantation (RAKT) has recently been introduced to reduce the morbidity of open kidney transplantation (KT).

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate perioperative and early postoperative RAKT outcomes.

DESIGN, SETTING AND

PARTICIPANTS

This was a multicenter prospective observational study of 120 patients who underwent RAKT, predominantly with a living donor kidney, in eight European institutions between July 2015 and May 2017, with minimum follow-up of 1 mo. The robot-assisted surgical steps were transperitoneal dissection of the external iliac vessels, venous/arterial anastomosis, graft retroperitonealization, and ureterovesical anastomosis.

OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Descriptive analysis of surgical data and their correlations with functional outcomes.

RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: The median operative and vascular suture time was 250 and 38min, respectively. The median estimated blood loss was 150ml. No major intraoperative complications occurred, although two patients needed open conversion. The median postoperative estimated glomerular filtration rate was 21.2, 45.0, 52.6, and 58.0ml/min on postoperative day 1, 3, 7, and 30, respectively. Both early and late graft function were not related to overall operating time or rewarming time. Five cases of delayed graft function (4.2%) were reported. One case (0.8%) of wound infection, three cases (2.5%) of ileus, and four cases of bleeding (3.3%; three of which required blood transfusion), managed conservatively, were observed. One case (0.8%) of deep venous thrombosis, one case (0.8%) of lymphocele, and three cases (2.5%) of transplantectomy due to massive arterial thrombosis were recorded. In five cases (4.2%), surgical exploration was performed for intraperitoneal hematoma. Limitations of the study include selection bias, the lack of an open control group, and failure to report on patient cosmetic satisfaction.

CONCLUSIONS

When performed by surgeons with robotic and KT experience, RAKT is safe and reproducible in selected cases and yields excellent graft function.

PATIENT SUMMARY: We present the largest reported series on robot-assisted kidney transplantation. Use of a robotic technique can yield low complication rates, rapid recovery, and excellent graft function. Further investigations need to confirm our promising data.

Для цитирования: Breda Alberto, Territo Angelo, Gausa Luis, Tuğcu Volkan, Alcaraz Antonio, Musquera Mireia, Decaestecker Karel, Desender Liesbeth, Stockle Michael, Janssen Martin, Fornara Paolo, Mohammed Nasreldin, Siena Giampaolo, Serni Sergio, Guirado Luis, Facundo Carma, Doumerc Nicolas. Robot-assisted Kidney Transplantation: The European Experience.. European urology. 2017. DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2017.08.028.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.