DOI 10.3390/healthcare14101370
Sand Mandala: A Case Study in the Essence of Psychological Resilience, Growth, and Thriving in Life After Stroke.
Аннотация
Background/
Objectives
Psychological resilience is associated with improved quality of life after stroke, yet less is known about how resilience and mindfulness interact over time in long-term recovery. This qualitative instrumental case study aimed to describe how psychological resilience and mindfulness unfolded in one stroke survivor with high psychological resilience and to identify processes that may inform future research on long-term stroke rehabilitation. Method: We conducted an instrumental qualitative case study involving a stroke survivor and his spouse (carepartner), using an in-depth interview framework for data collection and grounded theory procedures to support analysis. Data sources included interview transcripts and contextual artifacts, such as personal and professional websites, emails, and informal conversations. Findings: Three interrelated themes described how resilience unfolded in this case: (a) antecedents to poststroke resilience: personality traits, values, behavioral modeling, and environmental factors; (b) the obstacle is the way to posttraumatic growth; and (c) poststroke resilience: mindfulness embodied. Together, these themes suggest how prestroke strengths, responses to adversity, and mindfulness practice interacted in this participant's long-term recovery.
Conclusions
This exploratory case study offers a detailed account of how resilience and mindfulness may interact after stroke in one highly resilient individual. The findings are hypothesis-generating and may help guide future research on mindfulness-based and holistic approaches to long-term stroke recovery in larger and more diverse populations.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.