Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
Lessons Learned: Why Motivational Interviewing Should Be Adapted to Socio-Cultural Contexts.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Kirby Christine, Baldwin Julie A, Elwell Kristan, Parsons Michelle Anne
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: The literature shows inconclusive results from utilizing motivational interviewing (MI) in indigenous populations to address early childhood caries (ECC). Great Beginnings for Healthy Native Smiles (GBHNS) (NIDCR U01DE028508), a community focused oral health (OH) intervention, was utilized alongside adapted MI techniques to promote OH care and education at home.
METHODS: The intervention was conducted by local Community Health Representatives (CHRs) from the two partnered indigenous communities. Reflecting on the years-long MI training and CHRs' concerns, GBHNS conducted post-intervention semi-structured interviews with all MI staff regarding their experiences with MI. This paper uses participant observation, semi-structured interviewing, and inductive and deductive qualitative coding and analysis.
RESULTS: Thematic analysis was used to explore lessons learned and future research recommendations for interventions considering the use of MI. Generally considered a person-centered approach, MI reinforces Western psychological frameworks and practices which may disrupt local communicative practices and values.
CONCLUSIONS: Specifically, interdisciplinary pre-intervention community assessments are recommended to ensure acceptability, relevance and appropriateness through attention to local communicative practices.
METHODS: The intervention was conducted by local Community Health Representatives (CHRs) from the two partnered indigenous communities. Reflecting on the years-long MI training and CHRs' concerns, GBHNS conducted post-intervention semi-structured interviews with all MI staff regarding their experiences with MI. This paper uses participant observation, semi-structured interviewing, and inductive and deductive qualitative coding and analysis.
RESULTS: Thematic analysis was used to explore lessons learned and future research recommendations for interventions considering the use of MI. Generally considered a person-centered approach, MI reinforces Western psychological frameworks and practices which may disrupt local communicative practices and values.
CONCLUSIONS: Specifically, interdisciplinary pre-intervention community assessments are recommended to ensure acceptability, relevance and appropriateness through attention to local communicative practices.